The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 203 contributions

Speeches by Thornberry.

Every Hansard contribution by Emily Thornberry this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 203 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 11Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
15 Oct 2025 Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill

I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Minister for her remarks and for the attention that the FCDO has paid to the importance of marine conservation. The biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction treaty represents a transformation in the way that we protect nature in the high seas. I commend the Government for being an e

environmenteconomy-jobs
1,107
15 Oct 2025 Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill

I must say that we are all behaving so well this afternoon. I was saying that there is no incentive or funding mechanism in the Chagos archipelago deal, yet the treaty we are talking about—the subject of the Bill we are giving a Second Reading today—does have that very funding mechanism. Why does it? Because we know th

environmenteconomy-jobs
278
14 Oct 2025 Ukraine

I begin by publicly welcoming the Foreign Secretary to her new post, and by echoing her comments about the previous Foreign Secretary. I also welcome her commitment to finally using the Russian frozen assets. I hope that the situation will be resolved soon, because those assets are needed for the defence and reconstruc

defenceenergyfiscal-policy
182
12 Oct 2025 Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case

It seems that there is now case law saying that an enemy is a threat to national security. Frankly, that seems to be a lower test not a higher test. But if, in 2024, there was evidence that China was an enemy and the Crown Prosecution Service had made a decision to prosecute on that basis, I cannot understand why there

defencemp-performancecrime
105
12 Oct 2025 Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case

May I begin by expressing solidarity with the two previous Conservative Chairs of the Foreign Affairs Committee, who would seem to have suffered from having Chinese spies in their offices? That must have been very distressing, upsetting and threatening. The DPP’s claim of needing further evidence from the Government an

defencemp-performancecrime
193
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

Will the Minister help us with this? In the letter that the new Foreign Secretary wrote to me, she said that the Cabinet Office propriety and ethics team conducted a due diligence process at the request of No. 10 prior to the announcement of the appointment, and that the FCDO was not asked to contribute to that process

mp-performancedefenceother
88
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

Genuinely guys, just give me a chance to put this before you. The Foreign Secretary’s letter states that—[Interruption.] I hope that the hon. Member for Hinckley and Bosworth (Dr Evans) will give me an opportunity to put this before the House. I apologise for calling hon. Members “guys”. The Foreign Secretary’s letter

mp-performancedefenceother
272
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I would not quite put it like that; I think that the Executive do, in the end, make the decision—they are the Executive. However, I think that we should, as a Select Committee, have a role in this process, particularly when it comes to political appointments. It has happened before, as the right hon. Gentleman may reme

mp-performancedefenceother
105
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I really am finishing. If we do not have the opportunity to scrutinise this failure, how can we ensure that we stop it from happening again? We need to improve our scrutiny and our decision making.

mp-performancedefenceother
36
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I will get to the end of this paragraph, and then I will give way. That is why yesterday my Committee asked the Foreign Office permanent under-secretary and the Cabinet Office head of propriety and ethics to appear before us and explain what went wrong. We have been told that no one is available before the recess, but

mp-performancedefenceother
68
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I think it is slightly more subtle than that. The point is that if Lord Mandelson had appeared before the Committee, he would have faced a range of questions that would have highlighted issues that needed to be considered properly and that could not, in the rush to appoint him, be overlooked in the way they seem to hav

mp-performancedefenceother
114
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I think this is quite important, and I would like to have the opportunity to inform the House with clarity so that we all know where we stand. I believe that this contribution to the debate is an important one. It is not a party political point; it is just trying to ensure that we learn from what we have heard. The For

mp-performancedefenceother
121
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

My Committee first asked for the opportunity to question Lord Mandelson at the end of last year, when rumours first surfaced about his appointment as ambassador to the United States. We continued to ask after his appointment was confirmed. Indeed, the Minister may remember our exchange, on 14 January in this Chamber, w

mp-performancedefenceother
634
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

Clearly, we all think that it was a mistake. The question is how the mistake occurred and how we can ensure that this sort of thing does not happen again, because something went very wrong. When Lord Mandelson was appointed, red flags were obviously missed or ignored. On the day that the American President lands in Bri

mp-performancedefenceother
78
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I will give way one final time, but then I will finish.

mp-performancedefenceother
12
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I think it is difficult to have answers to all the right hon. Gentleman’s questions at the moment. I think the most important thing is that lessons are learned, and even if all due process was followed and the inquiries were proceeded with to the letter, they clearly are not good enough and we need to change them. Eith

mp-performancedefenceother
92
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

The right hon. Gentleman raises some important points. The power of Select Committees to summon witnesses has been an ongoing debate, and I suspect we have not resolved it yet. He also raises the matter of Privy Counsellors; our Committee has myself and another Privy Council member. The difficulty is that if we were of

mp-performancedefenceother
141
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

My hon. Friend may be surprised to hear that I agree with her completely. I think that would be very wise.

mp-performancedefenceother
21
9 Sept 2025Qatar: Israeli Strike

What happened overnight illustrates a huge problem that the new Foreign Secretary will need to deal with; I am pleased that the Minister will be ably helping her. The problem is this: there is an emboldened, far-right Israeli Government who believe that they can do whatever they like and there will be no consequences,

defenceeconomy-jobsother
147
1 Sept 2025Chagos Islands

Given that the Foreign Office has not agreed with Mauritius a defined financial allocation for the Chagos marine protected area; given that no additional money has been secured or ringfenced for environmental protection; given that no one who would be involved in the administration of the marine protected area has so m

defencefiscal-policy
147
← PreviousPage 5 of 11 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.