The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 447 contributions

Speeches by Darlington.

Every Hansard contribution by Emily Darlington this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 447 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

I don’t even know what to say to that.

9
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

You are saying that the statements I read earlier, which are clearly not proven in scientific fact, are now acceptable on all Meta platforms.

24
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

You cannot possibly think that statements like those, where there are scientific facts that prove otherwise, are there for anything other than causing and inciting harm, whether online or in-person harm, can you? Do you think it is a genuine debate about whether or not trans people are real, or whether they are mentall

66
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

I am conscious that I am taking up a lot of time. I just want to ask a question of Meta. In December, Meta submitted some written evidence to this Committee stating that its third-party fact-checking programme was a “key part” of its approach to combating misinformation. How does that fit with the new programme coming

108
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

If people use the TikTok tools to generate the video, it will automatically do that. That is not necessarily how content is created.

23
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

But can it do it today?

6
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

Can an algorithm and AI checking, in terms of moderating content—all three companies are using it, but the question is to you—identify and assess AI-generated material without a human factor?

30
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

You say that you do not want people to be misled by political or financial issues. This clearly falls into that category, right?

23
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

On this account, it is not their only video; it is repetitive, featuring Keir Starmer in AI doing various things. You cannot reach 2.8 million views without some level of boost from the algorithm, can you?

36
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

I want to turn next to Alistair and TikTok. Looking at your own guidelines, I want to understand how the algorithm catches this and how it changes it. They say that synthetic or manipulated material showing realistic scenes must clearly be disclosed, and do not allow synthetic media of any real private figure. You allo

149
25 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 441)

Okay. Let’s move on. The thing is that these are not unique. I am not the only MP who gets these kinds of messages on these accounts, reports them and no action is taken.

34
24 Feb 2025Topical Questions

T2. I thank the Minister for her previous answers, and for her commitment to reducing the number of asylum claimants in the UK. As she will know, the UK is spending 27% of its official development assistance on housing asylum claimants—almost double the OECD average. Our overseas spend was cut by the previous Governmen

crimeimmigrationsocial-care
82
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

Life sciences is one that you have direct in terms of the industrial strategy. It is also one of our important missions in improving health. I want to understand a little bit more about where you see some of the fantastic science work that we are doing, the links with the Biobank, and the opportunities for universal sc

94
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

Given those opportunities and given that we are an attractive environment, do we have the right strategies to attract that global talent to the UK? Should we be looking at additional incentives to attract some of those scientists over to our shores?

42
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

I have a really quick question. The Labour manifesto committed to a 10-year R&D settlement. Are we expecting the spending review to set out that 10-year settlement? What do you see as the benefits of a 10-year settlement for this area?

41
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

I can see how excited you are by that. We are all quite excited. How long do you think it will be before this is a universally offered service to people on the NHS in the context of moving to prevention, moving to early intervention and understanding more about our individual risks of particular diseases or cancers?

57
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

Specifically on the Ox-Cam growth corridor and your role now in being the champion for that, I would like to understand a little bit more about your vision for it. Do you see it as an Oxford and Cambridge or as an Oxford to Cambridge? What is the role for the towns and cities in between? Are they just to be dormitory,

80
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

To push you a little further on that, does this present an opportunity for the UK to step forward on areas that quite clearly the new Administration are not comfortable with federal funding going into? Should we be looking at increasing the amount, maybe through MRC, to fill that void and take advantage of that opportu

56
11 Feb 2025Science, Innovation and Technology Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 718)

Thank you, Patrick, for being here, and Alex. One of the key things that I am sure is on your plate are the changing geopolitics and attitudes to different science and innovation across the world. In particular, in the last few weeks, we have seen the hollowing out of NIH. We have seen differing attitudes to vaccines,

139
5 Feb 2025Chagos Islands

Does the Minister agree that, despite the Member for the Trump Government’s misrepresentations, the UK Government must provide their own independent global leadership based on UK values and UK interests to make a safer world, despite or because of the new US Administration’s changing foreign policy, including closing t

defenceeconomy-jobs
60
← PreviousPage 17 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.