The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 328 contributions

Speeches by Reed.

Every Hansard contribution by David Reed this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 328 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 17Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am not sure that I welcome that intervention. To say that I am aligned with the people who—

defencetechnologylabour-market
19
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

That is exactly what the hon. Member just said. I will go back in Hansard to check what he just said.

defencetechnologylabour-market
21
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

To back up the shadow Minister’s point, I was an air cadet for a number of years—[Interruption.] I know he is laughing at that, but in my experience, it was not about recruitment or a pathway into the armed forces. It was really powerful to have, as a youngster, the opportunity to do adventure training, shooting and fl

defence
102
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the clause, which seems a sensible and practical strengthening of the duty of commanding officers to report serious offences. The Minister, as a former commanding officer, will have experienced this duty at first hand, so I respect his judgment and expertise on the matter. It is right that responsibility shou

defence
167
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We welcome clauses 18 and 19 on summary hearings and deprivation orders with the punishments available to commanding officers. They represent a serious aim and a proportionate update to the summary hearing powers available to commanding officers. Clause 18 would promote greater consistency across the services, by enabl

defence
165
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

It continues to be a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. Clauses 21 to 24 cover powers to impose post-charge conditions on persons not in service detention. We welcome these clauses as sensible, technical enforcement improvements to the service justice system. They address a number of anomalies and gaps,

defence
129
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We want to strengthen the Bill by working with the Government and taking a collaborative approach. Having a shared reality, in any aspect of life, is massively important. Among Opposition Members, there is alignment on the shared reality that we heard about, when we went down to Portsmouth, from the people we empower t

defence
87
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

These clauses deal with entry for purposes of obtaining evidence, arrest and detention by civil authorities, pre-charge custody, and time limits for charging certain offences. It is right that service police are given clear and effective powers to obtain evidence, as the Minister has laid out clearly, and that such pow

defence
127
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will add to the arguments of my hon. Friend the Member for Solihull West and Shirley, my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford and the hon. Member for North Devon. The Opposition’s recollections align very closely with those of our Liberal Democrat colleague. Although we did not hear about a system t

defence
162
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I acknowledge the intention behind amendment 6, and I thank the hon. Member for North Devon for tabling it. It is designed to ensure that serious offences, including sexual violence and domestic abuse, are investigated by civilian police with the specialist expertise and resources that those cases demand. That is an ob

defence
170
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

Clause 10 is a necessary and proportionate step to ensure that victims of service offences are properly recognised and supported within the military justice system. Those affected by such offences often face distinct pressures linked to service life, including close living and working environments and concerns about re

defence
178
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister is laying out a very well-structured argument, and I see many of the points, but I wonder about certain circumstances. For instance, if a serviceperson took drugs and was kicked out—they have to abide by those rules, which we all know about in the armed forces—what would then happen?

defence
51
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 27 aligns the service justice system with the civilian courts and introduces a constructive way for offenders to reduce their disqualification period through completion of an approved course. On our side of the Committee we see that as a practical and proportionate reform that supports rehabilitation, encourages

defence
64
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, I completely agree. If a crime has happened and the victim engages with a support unit, having to move between civilian and military judicial systems, and switch between people that they have had trusted conversations with, is—if I were to put myself in their shoes—probably not what they want to do if they have be

defence
118
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We have talked a lot about the UK, but can the Minister give some clarity on when those offences happen abroad? Say, for instance, someone was on an overseas base in Cyprus, and the Cypriot police were to be involved. What would happen at that point and how would that affect the equation?

defence
53
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will expand on clause 30. I pay tribute to my near-ish neighbour in Cornwall, the hon. Member for Truro and Falmouth, for her work on the issue and how she has progressed it in the House of Commons. I think that clause 30, which will extend the remit of the Armed Forces Commissioner to include the Royal Fleet Auxilia

defence
658
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clauses 28 and 29 are practical and proportionate reforms. Clause 28 defines rehabilitation periods for certain service punishments under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. Sanctions such as reduction in rank, forfeiture of seniority and service supervision and punishment orders will no longer be treated as spen

defence
140
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will just pick up on a point I raised this morning, which I discussed with an hon. Friend who has experience in this space. Take, for example, a crime that is committed while a person is serving that is not serious enough to warrant their being remanded into custody—it goes over the six months because it is a knotty

defence
128
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is difficult to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Solihull West and Shirley—he is a former Army officer, a doctor and a barrister—but I will attempt to add to the debate. This issue is clear: under the present framework, a service court can only impose protective orders—such as a sexual harm prevention order, a s

defence
578
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will make that intervention now, and then we can carry on that conversation. If there is zero tolerance of drugs, and if the person who has committed a crime knows they will be kicked out—as they should be—it would be good to hear from the Ministry of Defence if there is a loophole in which someone could say, “I will

defence
111
← PreviousPage 2 of 17 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.