The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,227 contributions

Speeches by Jones.

Every Hansard contribution by Darren Jones this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 1,227 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 62Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

No.

mp-performancedefencetechnology
1
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

Again, I thank the hon. Gentleman, as Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, for providing oversight of the Government’s processes on behalf of Parliament. On his first question, about security clearance being concluded before an announcement is made, he is right. That is something tha

mp-performancedefencetechnology
189
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I am afraid that I am not at the Dispatch Box to speak on behalf of Mr Mandelson, and I was not in the developed vetting interview process; nor have I seen that information, so I cannot answer the specific questions that my hon. Friend has asked me. What I can do, though, is point her to the relevant comments in my sta

mp-performancedefencetechnology
101
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I look forward to engaging with the right hon. Gentleman in the general debate on Wednesday, in which, of course, I commit to the House that I will do my best to answer questions that are put to me. On the Prime Minister’s communications, I point out to the House that Prime Ministers do not sit at computers, sending em

mp-performancedefencetechnology
81
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

indicated assent.

mp-performancedefencetechnology
2
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

The first part of my hon. Friend’s question goes to the point I made in my statement about the importance of allowing the developed vetting interviews to be fully confidential. We need to ensure that when people join the Government and undertake a DV interview, they are fully transparent with the Government about any r

mp-performancedefencetechnology
80
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

The hon. Lady invites me in her first question to comment on the intent of conversations between people other than myself. I am sure the House will understand that all I can do at the Dispatch Box is refer to the documents disclosed in the bundle, given that I was not privy to those conversations. The hon. Lady asks me

mp-performancedefencetechnology
257
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

Without being able inadvertently to name specific documents, the best I can say to my right hon. Friend on the potential conflicts of interest, as I made clear in my statement, is that that nature of document has been made relevant from the perspective of the Metropolitan police criminal investigation.

mp-performancedefencetechnology
50
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his questions. There were three broad questions: first, on access to the documents; secondly, on what documents are available or not; and thirdly, on the redactions process. On access to the documents, as I said in my response to the urgent question before the recess, I have been mindful

mp-performancedefencetechnology
501
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

With permission, I would like to update the House on the Government’s response to the Humble Address of 4 February. Before I do, I think it is important for all of us to reflect again on the impact that this debate will have on the victims of Jeffrey Epstein. Members across the House will be aware of the truly horrific

mp-performancedefencetechnology
1,778
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

My hon. Friend is right to pull me up. That review has not concluded in the time in which I had initially hoped it would. Adrian Fulford is conducting the review at the moment, and knows that we want to be able to report on it shortly. I cannot tell the House what is in it yet, because I have not seen it, but as soon a

mp-performancedefencetechnology
77
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I am afraid the Government have powers to compel disclosure from Government employees, Ministers and special advisers, but do not have powers to compel disclosure from third parties outside our employment. However, the Metropolitan police will be conducting a criminal investigation, and I am sure there will be disclosu

mp-performancedefencetechnology
67
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

On the question about whether there was a follow-up meeting further to that request, I do not know the answer, so I will not make an assumption one way or another. If the hon. Gentleman tables a parliamentary question, I am sure that we will be able to check and confirm for him. He asked me about Peter Thiel. I will no

mp-performancedefencetechnology
114
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I thank my hon. Friend for his excellent work in this area. The Government have learned a great deal from his expertise. The House knows that this area sits alongside other areas—non-corporate communications channels, peerage removal in the House of Lords, lobbying, transparency and the work of the Ethics and Integrity

mp-performancedefencetechnology
107
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

The communication of the Prime Minister’s decision does exist in the first tranche, where his principal private secretary drafted a letter communicating the Prime Minister’s decision to the relevant stakeholders.

mp-performancedefencetechnology
30
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I would first say to the hon. Member that the disclosure of information from Bloomberg and subsequently from the United States Department of Justice showed a depth and extent of relationship between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein that nobody was aware of—nobody was aware of that until that information became publi

mp-performancedefencetechnology
174
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, and I would not want to displease a fan with an inadequate performance from the Dispatch Box. We have considered whether I should open and close the debate on Wednesday, which would be unusual, but we have decided instead that my colleague the Paymaster General and Minister for the

mp-performancedefencetechnology
97
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I gently point out that No. 10 is not occupied solely by men; there are very senior women who work in the Labour party and the Labour Government. In relation to the sentiment of the right hon. Lady’s question, which I agree with, it is important that we have a diversity of views and a diversity of inputs into the decis

mp-performancedefencetechnology
73
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I refer my hon. Friend to my earlier answer at the Dispatch Box in relation to calls for an investigation of Labour Together, which is a privately owned organisation outside Government and public service. As for to her invitation to name individuals who have been protected in the disclosure by third-party redactions th

mp-performancedefencetechnology
101
1 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question. He knows, because I have said it repeatedly at the Dispatch Box, that I take very seriously the role of Parliament holding the Government to account, in particular, as a former Select Committee Chair, the role of Select Committees as well as the statements and questions we m

mp-performancedefencetechnology
136
← PreviousPage 2 of 62 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.