The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 860 contributions

Speeches by Kruger.

Every Hansard contribution by Danny Kruger this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 860 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 43Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

I would, but actually I am making an intervention. It may appear that I am making a speech, so I will soon sit down, but I would be interested in the hon. Gentleman’s response to the suggestion that even he —the paragon of virtue that he is—might not be entirely resistant to the economic incentives in the system. That

healthsocial-care
77
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 525, in clause 32, page 19, line 26, leave out subsection (2).

healthsocial-care
17
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

In opposing my amendment, the hon. Member is declaring herself content with the text of the clause as it is. The text as drafted would allow a doctor to be paid more, the more applications that they receive, process and refer on. That might not be, in her mind, how the system should work—I would be grateful to know how

healthsocial-care
120
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

In a moment. The potential—as would happen in other parts of genuine healthcare—is that the more work people do, the more money they get. My concern is that that induces a dangerous incentive into the system. Having a global fee paid to a provider who managed the service would be much safer. The crucial point is that w

healthsocial-care
76
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I intend, in a later debate when we come to the new clause, to try to explain how I think we should have done this. The answer to the hon. Gentleman’s question is that an organisation should be resourced—I think through philanthropy, rather than taxpayers’ money or people paying out of their own pocket, but the point s

healthsocial-care
123
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

We can distinguish between the organisational income and the specific doctor’s income, but the same applies in both cases. Explicitly, the doctor who is making the decisions should not feel the pressure or the temptation of financial reward to expedite or approve applications for assisted dying. I am grateful for the h

healthsocial-care
92
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. This will be my last speech in this Committee, so before I speak to the important principle expressed in new clause 34, may I thank you, Sir Roger, and all your colleagues who have chaired the Committee? I also thank the Clerks, who have done a huge amount of amazin

healthsocial-care
1,365
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I will press new clause 34 to a vote. Question put, That the clause be read a Second time.

healthsocial-care
19
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

This is a very important debate, and my concern is that there is a naive assumption that the innate goodness of doctors will render them impervious to all the incentives in the system. As the hon. Lady suggests, if it were possible, as I think it is under the Bill, for a profit-making organisation—a company—to set itse

healthsocial-care
165
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

First, on the proposed amendment to the NHS Act, will the Minister confirm that the implication is that it is not currently possible to deliver assisted dying services under the Act? Secondly, to help me understand new clause 36, is it proposed that the Government will amend the NHS Act through regulations, a statutory

healthsocial-care
120
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I take your ruling, Mrs Harris, but the amendment is explicitly about this.

healthsocial-care
13
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

I entirely agree with the hon. Lady. We are all equally ethical and unethical—the point is that we respond to incentives, and incentives have their effect. Does she agree that there is a further concern? If we had a tariff system, which we probably would, that would by definition create a market, if there was the oppor

healthsocial-care
162
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

I didn’t know it was illegal. [Laughter.]

healthsocial-care
7
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

That is the purpose of my amendment.

healthsocial-care
7
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

The hon. Lady is absolutely right. I am not sure that anything in the Bill would preclude a private provider—“Virgin Health” or some such organisation—from providing the whole pathway of the assisted death, including employing, albeit in separate clinics or separate practices, the two doctors who would provide the two

healthsocial-care
75
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I imagine that a doctor who works for the non-profit service I am envisioning would be paid a salary and do their work, but would not be paid on a per-client basis—they would not be paid a tariff for the number of people they passed through the system, let alone for the different chunks of the process. People need to b

healthsocial-care
81
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

It is very good to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey, on what is probably our last day in Committee. I fully expect that we will reject clause 32 in due course, so although I want to move my amendment, I have no intention of pushing it or any of the other amendments in this group to a vote, but I do want to take

healthsocial-care
1,019
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-eighth sitting)

No, I fundamentally disagree: end-of-life care is healthcare. It is addresses symptoms and conditions, and it is designed in a way that is completely compatible with the founding principle of the NHS, whereas the Bill—I appreciate the honesty of the drafters in recognising this, even if they do not quite spell it out—a

healthsocial-care
835
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I am keen on actual judges who sit in court with the full authority of a judge, not a retired judge sitting at the head of a quango very far away from the decisions made about assisted dying. Nevertheless, I am grateful to the hon. Lady, and I appreciate the fact that there will be a duty to consult. We want to have as

healthsocial-care
77
25 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-ninth sitting)

I appreciate that the amendments are necessary for the new design of the Bill, but I want to express my concern that they establish an assisted dying regime that is left to monitor itself. When the person who facilitates these profound decisions is also the one who reviews them, it threatens not just the integrity of t

healthsocial-care
355
← PreviousPage 10 of 43 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.