Speeches by Jarvis.
Every Hansard contribution by Dan Jarvis this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 601–620 of 1,144 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “My hon. Friend is absolutely right to raise her concerns in the way that she does. I hope that she understands, as the House does, that this Government have been absolutely clear that no interference in our democratic process is remotely acceptable and that there are no circumstances under which we will tolerate countr…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 133 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I am grateful to my hon. Friend, not only for his question but for his previous service and for the work of his constituents with regard to underpinning our national security. He makes an important point. He will know—as will you, Madam Deputy Speaker—that the National Protective Security Authority recently published g…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 224 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I am genuinely grateful to the hon. Member for the points he has raised. Let me take them in turn. I lead on behalf of the Government on vetting, and a lot of work has taken place in government since we came into office to ensure that the systems and processes that underpin our vetting are fit for purpose. The hon. Gen…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 407 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his question and for the role he has played in these proceedings. Yes, I give him the absolute assurance he seeks. There is an important role for the House to play in looking carefully at precisely what has gone on. That is why, on behalf of the Government, I very much welcome the wo…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 102 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “Let me make this point crystal clear: no member of this Government, nor any special adviser, was in any way involved in the evidence submitted to the CPS or the decision by the DPP not to proceed with the case. There was an important omission from the shadow Home Secretary’s remarks. As hon. Members will know, the firs…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 277 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “The shadow Home Secretary would be well advised to listen to the points being made. I am seeking to respond to the questions that he and other right hon. and hon. Members have raised. I am trying to do that in good faith, and I would be grateful for the opportunity to do so. I remind the shadow Home Secretary that we a…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 201 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I do wonder whether at any point the shadow Home Secretary and certain Conservative Members—not all, but certain Members—have considered the need to have some humility and acknowledge their part in this. These activities took place on their watch, when they were in government, and under the legislation of the time.” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 51 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I am grateful for your guidance, Mr Speaker. I am simply pointing out to the shadow Home Secretary that Conservative Members have previously criticised Ministers and the Government for, to use their words, hanging officials out to dry, and now the shadow Home Secretary has just named twice an official from the Foreign,…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 58 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “Thank you, Mr Speaker. The Opposition’s position is confusing. They initially criticised the Government for intervening. Then, when it became absolutely clear that we had not done that, they criticised us for not intervening. They asked for greater transparency, then when we provided it they accused the Government—wron…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 115 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “With great respect, a lot of what has just been said does not actually relate to the urgent question that was initially asked by the shadow Home Secretary. I have to say, the Opposition’s position is confusing. They initially criticised the Government for intervening. Then—[Interruption.] I will answer the question. I …” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 91 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “As I have repeatedly made clear in this House, Ministers and special advisers were not involved in any aspect of the production of the evidence, and I stand by that statement today. The Prime Minister has also made clear that he was informed of the CPS’s decision only a matter of days before the case collapsed. There i…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 333 |
| 19 Oct 2025 | Alleged Spying Case: Home Office Involvement “I thank the shadow Home Secretary for the question, and I thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to respond to it today. As I have repeatedly set out to the House, the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and the wider Government are extremely disappointed that this case will not be heard in court. I have heard the s…” defencemp-performanceeconomy-jobs | 199 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “With respect to the hon. Member, I am not going to become involved in a critique about whether the Government should have responded in a different way, because that is a matter for them. However, he mentioned the important work of the ISC. The Government consider that the ISC has a very important role to play in Parlia…” defencemp-performancecrime | 113 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “I have been crystal clear—[Interruption.] If hon. Members will allow me, let me say that China poses a series of threats to the United Kingdom, and I was very clear about what they were. I referred specifically to a number of particular issues. I could not have been clearer about that.” defencemp-performancecrime | 51 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “I am grateful to the hon. Member, as always. I think he is referring to activity that took place under the previous Government, but let me agree with his basic point: the public do want to know what has happened. That is why the Government have put forward a statement today, to provide that transparency. What I think t…” defencemp-performancecrime | 143 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “Fundamentally, the decision was one for the DPP and the CPS. I could not have been clearer about the fact that this Government have not sought to interfere with the process.” defencemp-performancecrime | 31 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “The hon. Member referenced the China audit; I am sure that he will acknowledge that the then Foreign Secretary came to the House to give a statement specifically on the China audit. The reason why the China audit has not been published is that it is at a higher classification than documents that would normally be publi…” defencemp-performancecrime | 130 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “The hon. Member talks about my making great play of the need to work cross-party, but that is because I genuinely believe that on important matters of national security, we should proceed in a certain way, and where possible, we seek to work across the political divide to establish consensus. I thought there was a slig…” defencemp-performancecrime | 134 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “Any decision about the enhanced tier of FIRS will be brought forward to Parliament in the normal way. I can say to the hon. Member that any attempt by any foreign power to intimidate, harass or harm individuals or communities here in the UK will not be tolerated.” defencemp-performancecrime | 48 |
| 12 Oct 2025 | Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case “No, I do not agree.” defencemp-performancecrime | 5 |