The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 484 contributions

Speeches by Chope.

Every Hansard contribution by Christopher Chope this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 141160 of 484 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 8 of 25Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

But you speak as though this is an exact science—“Is a nuclear power plant in this particular area going to be safe?” These are matters of judgment, essentially, aren’t they? What is happening is that you have competing regulators exercising different areas of judgment at different stages in the process. Could it not a

60
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

Don’t we know it! A good friend of mine—a Member of Parliament, actually—made a fortune out of being counsel to the Sizewell B inquiry, and he never looked back. I thought the whole idea was that we were going to try and simplify this process so that we can get these small nuclear reactors up and running in our lifetim

64
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

But is it not possible to have one person in charge? If you are the chief executive of an applicant, in preparing your application, you are meant to have already taken into account all the issues around the environment, safety and so on. Why can we not have one individual appointed to decide these issues, instead of co

101
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

So because you are not prescriptive, you are not validating these claims?

12
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

You say that it is difficult to evaluate claims that are made—that applicants will claim this, that and the other, and that you as regulators have got to try and see whether those claims are valid. Instead of second-guessing that, is it not possible instead to bring in conditions to cover? If the applicant says it is g

114
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

Is not one of the key issues in regulation and licensing the need for applicants to have a one-stop shop? We are such a long way from that. What can you do, or what advice can you give the Government, to facilitate the creation of a one-stop shop? At the moment we have duplication and conflicting objectives. If I am an

142
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

If it is not safe, you will not get a licence for it so there is no point in going through the planning processes. Surely, the person who makes the application is going to have to have satisfied themselves that they meet all these criteria, and they will have entered into pre-application discussions with all the regula

104
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

Would it affect safety, for example, if we did not have EN-7, and a nuclear project instead had to rely solely on the generic aspects of EN-1?

27
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

May I ask some specific questions? Mitigation of seismic risk is a non-negotiable requirement for a site licence, yet it is being added into EN-7 as a planning consideration. Is that really helpful? What is the point of it?

39
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

Are you asking for this power?

6
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

I know that, but would you like to see the legislation or guidance changed?

14
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

Is that going to happen?

5
10 Sept 2025Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212)

That is a bit of a cop-out. So you are saying that these individual licensing authorities have to agree to do it? Do you think that is a satisfactory state of affairs, bearing in mind the problems?

37
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

I agree absolutely. If someone has suffered serious adverse effects from a covid-19 vaccine, it is not much consolation to them, their loved ones or those whose confidence we are trying to build to be told that because they are only 30% disabled they are not entitled to a penny. Someone who is 59% disabled is not entit

healthsocial-care
613
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

The Minister says she cannot give us an exact timeline. Could she give us an approximate time? Is this going to be finished before the end of this year, for example? That is not an exact timeline, but it would be an indicative timeline. And when she talks about various options, can she not explain which of those option

healthsocial-care
132
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

Obviously, the Minister has a brief that has been given to her by officials on behalf of the Minister with responsibility for public health, the hon. Member for West Lancashire (Ashley Dalton), who is not able to be here. Can this Minister give me some assurance that I, together with my colleagues who have participated

healthsocial-care
115
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

I am very grateful to my right hon. Friend. I hope that the Minister listened to her and will have direct answers to the questions that she raised. Having spent so much time badgering my right hon. Friend, when she was a Minister in the Cabinet Office, to get something done on this issue, I perhaps need to take the opp

healthsocial-care
138
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

My right hon. and learned Friend is absolutely right. I have before me the answer that he received from the Secretary of State when he raised the matter at Health questions on 17 June: “I reassure the right hon. and learned Gentleman, the constituents of his I have met and other campaigners that I am having discussions

healthsocial-care
221
2 Sept 2025 Covid-19 Vaccination Harm

I beg to move, That this House has considered Government support for people harmed following covid-19 vaccinations. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Lewell. This is a hot topic. The Secretary of State told my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Kenilworth and Southam (Sir Jeremy Wright) in

healthsocial-care
799
1 Sept 2025 Solar Development: Newark

One way of dealing with that would be for the Government to prohibit the import of solar panels and insist that, as a condition of such solar farms, panels must be produced within the United Kingdom. Would that not be a sensible policy?

energyagricultureenvironment
43
← PreviousPage 8 of 25 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.