The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 309 contributions

Speeches by Cane.

Every Hansard contribution by Charlotte Cane this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 309 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 16Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

I commend Cotswold district council for that work. Unfortunately, when I tried to get East Cambridgeshire district council to condemn the two-child cap, the Conservatives refused. This policy was poorly conceived from the outset and has amounted to little more than attacks—not on parents, but on vulnerable children gro

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
444
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

Like so many Members from across the House, I welcome the Government’s decision finally to scrap the two-child limit on benefits—I just wish they had done so much earlier. The two-child limit is a cruel and unfair penalty on those in the most urgent need of welfare and support. The cap does not tackle the exploitation

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
119
3 Feb 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 899)

Yes, Chair. I am a district councillor, East Cambridgeshire District Council.

11
2 Feb 2026Indefinite Leave to Remain

I congratulate the petitioners on bringing forward this important debate. The Government’s immigration White Paper has caused no end of confusion, anxiety and distress since its publication last year. To me, and to countless constituents who have contacted me because they are worried for their livelihoods, it is profou

immigrationsocial-carehealth
443
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Subject to what might be discussed, I should declare that I am a civil service pensioner.

16
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

There has been a recent, rather prominent case, and you cannot remove a peerage other than through an Act of Parliament, so as well as removing their right to sit in the House of Lords, should there be a mechanism to remove their peerage as well?

46
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Moving on to the thorny issue of disgraced peers, you committed to tackling the issue of how we remove them. What plans have you got to address that?

28
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

You are an historian; you like to have your documents tidy. I am an archaeologist, so I am used to digging them out, but never mind. Part of the reason for these citations is that you think expertise is the strength of the Lords and you want to explain. Normally, when you are trying to fill gaps, there is some sort of

81
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

You are now publishing the new appointment citations on gov.uk, but—and it sounds like you have found this problem as well—there doesn’t seem to be a single location where you can find all the citations. Would it be useful to have a single page so that they can all be seen?

51
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Some historical citations have been released. Do you think it would be useful to release all of them so that people can get a sense of why people have been appointed historically?

32
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

To follow up on the citations, they are basically 150 words. Does that really provide enough information about why that person has been appointed?

24
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Let’s say that you manage to get the Lords down to whatever you consider a reasonable number. Do you have any plans in place for making sure that it doesn’t creep up again?

33
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Once you have removed the hereditary peers, the bishops will still have their direct route in, but all the other routes will be through prime ministerial patronage. Your manifesto committed to reforming the appointments system, so what are your plans to reform it?

43
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

That creates a kind of arms race in the size of the House of Lords. You talked about looking at—effectively—retirement ages, but what other mechanisms do you have in mind for reducing the size?

34
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Talking about appointing peers, the Prime Minister is appointing them faster than at any other time since 1999. He has already appointed more life peers than there are currently hereditary peers, so he has increased the numbers. The Government identified the size of the House of Lords as an issue; are they not keen to

59
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

You mention that we are coming up to the end of this Session. If it does not get through in this Session, would you use the Parliament Act in the next Session?

32
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

Do you think that anything needs to be done to address that?

12
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

You set out last year that the Government’s first priority in reforming the House of Lords was to remove hereditary peers. That has not yet been achieved. Are you disappointed that that has not yet been agreed between the two Houses?

41
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

I welcome the hardship grants. I would ask that you send all MPs details of that. I am sure we have all got it in our inbox—I have at least two people in that situation. I would also like you to consider whether people could get some sort of compensation, because those two people had made financial commitments on the e

496
28 Jan 2026Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 463)

There have been some reports that, in response to the Bill, some of the Lords have sought to slow down other aspects of the Government’s legislative agenda. Do you share that assessment? If so, do you think it is problematic?

40
← PreviousPage 5 of 16 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.