The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 473 contributions

Speeches by Thomas.

Every Hansard contribution by Bradley Thomas this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 473 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 24Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment

This is a particularly sorry saga. It is corrosive for not just this Government and the Labour party, but the entire political class and politicians as a collective body and it is certainly corrosive for the country. That is because a theme has emerged from this episode and others under this Government around competenc

mp-performancedefenceeconomy-jobs
747
21 Apr 2026Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment

On that point, will the hon. Gentleman give way?

mp-performancedefenceeconomy-jobs
9
13 Apr 2026Southport Inquiry

I thank the Home Secretary for her statement. Does she plan to provide any additional resource or funding to the Prevent programme? If so, does she have any initial idea as to where that may be targeted?

crimesocial-carehealth
37
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

Does my right hon. Friend acknowledge the comments made by Greg Jackson, the founder of Octopus Energy, who said that importing LNG has a greater carbon footprint than extraction from the North sea? Does he also agree that Labour and the Liberal Democrats are now acknowledging that the renewables market is itself not c

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
54
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

We are increasingly dependent on China because of decisions taken by this Government. The pursuit of renewables-based future energy infrastructure is increasingly dependent on countries that are adversarial to us and pose a risk to our long-term energy security. The hon. Member is right on that point. This is not just

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
124
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

Net zero is a socialist dream, because it epitomises centralised control, Government interference in daily life and redistribution. When an idea becomes immune to scrutiny, it is precisely then that scrutiny is most needed. That definitely applies in the case of Britain’s rush to net zero, because in our haste, we risk

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
184
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

I will not give way any further. To accelerate the decline of that sector without a fully viable replacement is not just economically risky but fiscally short-sighted. At the same time, we must consider the livelihoods tied to the industry, as colleagues across the House have stressed. Tens of thousands of skilled work

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
341
24 Mar 2026Oil and Gas

We only have to speak to businesses across our constituencies, and they will tell us about the reality of the economic calamity caused by decisions taken by this Government and the costs bearing down on them. The reality is that choices made by this Government continue to hollow out our industrial base, not because we

energyeconomy-jobsenvironment
306
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

In this climate, with the pressure on bills that we are facing and the volatility, do you think it is fair for it to remain?

25
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

Do you categorically rule that out?

6
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

Given the pressure on bills, particularly at the minute, and the volatility we are facing, is the carbon tax and the carbon price support element something the Government will consider looking at in the future? Are the Government absolutely committed to that, or will they consider removing that from bills?

50
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

Given where we are at the minute, acknowledging that around one third of the wholesale price is to pay not for the gas but for this carbon tax, do you acknowledge that scrapping that tax, even in the short term, would have an impact on reducing bills?

47
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

Carbon price support is over and above what is levied in EU countries. Why do the Government not consider removing that element?

22
17 Mar 2026Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 736)

I would like to talk a little about the policy costs that are trickling through to bills, starting with the carbon tax. The Government are understandably concerned about gas prices and how they will feed through to electricity prices for electricity that is generated through gas. Why has the Government not taken off th

69
16 Mar 2026Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address

Does the Minister believe that a declaration of interests form should have been submitted for a role as significant as this?

mp-performancefiscal-policycrime
21
16 Mar 2026Heating Oil Support

While I welcome the Minister’s statement, my constituents and I have a few questions. How many households does the Minister project that this will be applied to? What does he foresee the average amount of support being? Is there a qualifying criterion in terms of benefits or household income? Will the fund be disbursed

cost-of-livingutilitieseconomy-jobs
75
11 Mar 2026Royal Mail: Universal Service Obligation

I pay tribute to the posties across Bromsgrove, but not to the management of Royal Mail. My constituents need action, not more platitudes, like Royal Mail saying to me that it is “very sorry” that letters have not been received. I implore the Minister to get together with the management of Royal Mail and Ofcom to deliv

utilitieslabour-marketeconomy-jobs
82
10 Mar 2026Digital ID: Public Consultation

My constituents have been incredibly vocal in telling me that they do not want this. Frankly, because trust in the Government has eroded so much, this scheme is dead in the water. If the Government go ahead with it, what will they do to ensure that there is no single depository containing the data of millions of citize

economy-jobsother
70
9 Mar 2026Immigration Policy

My constituents want the Government to get off their back and get on their side, rather than using their hard-earned taxpayers’ money to spend up to £40,000 on removing illegal asylum seekers. Will the Minister rule that out?

immigration
38
24 Feb 2026Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill (Seventh sitting)

Given that the threshold for a significant impact event will likely be much lower for an SME than for a larger corporation, and while acknowledging and agreeing that SMEs are the backbone of the economy and make up the vast majority of companies that employ people in this country, how does the hon. Gentleman propose to

defenceeconomy-jobslocal-government
92
← PreviousPage 4 of 24 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.