The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,426 contributions

Speeches by Gardiner.

Every Hansard contribution by Barry Gardiner this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 901920 of 1,426 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 46 of 72Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Apr 2025 Business of the House

Land-based gambling shops represent a silent crisis up and down this country, targeting some of our most disadvantaged and deprived communities. Will the Leader of the House join me in congratulating Muhammed Butt and Mili Patel, leader and deputy leader of Brent council, on their campaign, now supported by leaders of

housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs
104
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

That is if I can remember the question; I have so many. When we are considering features-based MPAs, it seems to me that when you talk about the seabirds, for example, that is the feature on which it was designated. It is immobile. The seabirds are in that spot for a particular reason, usually because it is feeding gro

264
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

We heard that there might be alternate MPAs providing that, but of course the MPAs that we have established were the ones that were most important for those features and, therefore, to get that elsewhere will be difficult. [Interruption.]

39
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

We have had talk at the Committee of changing the designation so that we could put in, for example, windmills. Look, I am all in favour of our renewables targets, but I want to get clarity on this.

38
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Under Natura 2000?

3
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

You could write to the Committee about that, but I wanted to pick up on the feature basis. You said about making sure that the MPAs were in the right place. The fact that they have been done on a feature basis ensures that they are in the right place because you are designating the protection of the feature that is the

113
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Yes, but, for five of them, the feature that is being protected is seabirds. Is that not correct?

18
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Five, is it not?

4
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Minister Hardy, can I start by picking up what you said about seabirds? We have 377 MPAs in the UK—about 200 in England alone. Do you know how many of them are protected for seabirds?

35
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Thank you. For an offshore wind project, there are separate processes for seabed leasing, marine consents, landfall and the onshore construction activity, but there is very little opportunity for the affected communities to participate in the decision making until the operations go through the terrestrial planning, whi

87
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Okay. How is the 45 to 50 GW that the Government have predicated of offshore wind by 2030 influencing your leasing process? How are you co-ordinating with Government to ensure that those leases are available? How are you doing it in such a way that it is not impacting on marine protected areas that are already establis

62
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

We will come to the local considerations in a minute.

10
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Thank you. I would like to do a Bamber Gascoigne and divide you up, give you each your starter for 10, but with no conferring on the next one. Whereas one of you is responsible for the licensing and the seabed, and owning the leases, it is the regulator that does the statutory planning. What I want to know is how you c

131
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Yes, of course. I was asking what involvement you had had in that consultation document.

15
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Ms Thomas, what about yourselves?

5
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Ms Willis, you said that you work very closely with DESNZ. Last month it published the “Building the North Sea’s Energy Future” consultation. Did you work closely with it on that? That consultation document talks about the transition from oil and gas to clean energy, but it does not seem to focus on the challenges of m

59
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

You did not have any input into that consultation document.

10
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

I think that is a reassurance that ultimately this will come out well. You talked about the features-based approach to MPAs but of course the whole-site approach has shown itself to be more effective for marine conservation protection than the features-based approach. We see that in the Lyme bay example. It is one of t

80
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

Minister, we heard that you are at the point of trying to get BBNJ ocean treaty ratified, which is great news, and you talked about the work that is being done that will mean that you can get on with it quickly. We heard from the witness earlier today from the MMO that they have completed their work on stage 3 and that

75
2 Apr 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 551)

I was trying to lead in gently.

7
← PreviousPage 46 of 72 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.