The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,529 contributions

Speeches by Gardiner.

Every Hansard contribution by Barry Gardiner this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 1,529 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 77Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Thank you very much. Mr Phillips, could I say “wolves” to you?

12
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

I am trying to focus on the ancient woodlands that have softwood plantation on them that are likely to be felled in the next five years. Can you give us an idea of the scale? Roughly how many hectares are up for grabs in the next five years?

48
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Dr Kirby, Mr Phillips talked about the importance of soil for sequestration. There is one thing we have not touched on that I want to ask about: do ancient woodlands have distinctive mycorrhizal networks? How important are they for the strength and survival of those woodlands?

46
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

But financial considerations are important.

5
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

And a bigger propensity for damage. What can or should be done to protect those smaller woodland areas? Is there a way of trying to insulate them against those wet soils and spring gales?

34
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Just to get a commercial eye on that, in your view, Mr Knight, is that offer sufficient to incentivise most private woodland owners not to plant, or to restock with Sitka spruce and other softwoods?

35
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Tell me how you go about incentivising them to do that before we get Dr Weatherall’s small grant schemes more focused on the development of ancient woodland. Perhaps, Mr Knight, you can then come in with what I would call the commercial timber perspective. We all recognise that commercial timber and softwood forestry i

57
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Dr Kirby, you spoke of wet soils and spring gales being probably a bad combination, and we understand that there are edge effects on woodland. What difference does the size of the woodland make to its ability to withstand those wet soils and spring gales?

45
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Or you could veto the project unless it incorporated building back with broadleaf and so on.

16
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

They can, but you also have the power to stop them. That is my point.

15
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

You do, actually. You have that power under section 12 of annexe 1 of the Forestry Commission framework document, which gives you the power to specify relevant projects and veto what landowners are doing, but you very rarely do that.

40
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Article 8 of the Forestry Commission framework document says that you have the power to set out that data for the production and supply and timber, so I assume that the Forestry Commission has the data, whether you yourself have it here or not.

44
11 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1750)

Hunting comes back once again.

5
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

Right. It is about 15% of the total storm overflows.

10
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

Secretary of State, my apologies for arriving so late. I was chairing another meeting, but no disrespect was intended. I trust I will not be going over anything that colleagues have covered. I tried to make sure of that beforehand. The water White Paper says that, over the next five years, £11 billion is being spent on

81
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

Is it something you will commit to looking at? People look at this, and they see a revolving door. They see the huge salaries that people get. They have been regulators, and suddenly they are on the other side of the fence and, Bob’s your uncle, they are earning much more than they ever would have as a public servant.

134
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

Certainly within five years.

4
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

One of the past directors of Ofwat went off to be a director of Thames Water.

16
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

I thought you had been a Minister. Sorry.

8
10 Mar 2026Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1749)

No, no, no.

3
← PreviousPage 10 of 77 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.