The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 898 contributions

Speeches by Eagle.

Every Hansard contribution by Angela Eagle this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 898 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 45Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Jun 2026Natural Disasters: Community Resilience

The overnight news of the earthquake in Venezuela, which has caused a lot of damage, is very concerning. I know that my colleagues in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office stand ready, as do we, to help with any recovery that the people of Venezuela may need, particularly in terms of rescue at this stage.

utilitiesenvironmentlocal-government
55
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I have to commend the hon. Member for Rutland and Stamford (Alicia Kearns) for doing her homework. I wish to explain why we do not think these amendments are needed at the moment. There are a couple of themes that run through my response to the hon. Lady’s amendments. The first is that it is not possible to treat a sta

defencecrimetechnology
449
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

It is not only diplomats. It may well be NGOs delivering humanitarian aid and people who have to come across states or their designated proxies in particular cases.

defencecrimetechnology
28
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The Bill does accord with the European convention on human rights, international law and all our obligations. The prohibited purpose test is there precisely to give assurance to bodies like the one that the hon. Member mentioned, so that there will not be any dubiety about whether they can engage with the organisations

defencecrimetechnology
64
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I think it is to cover all potential actions that individuals may undertake that are okay; they can assure themselves that an activity is okay, even if it involves a designated state, if it is not prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK. Many humanitarian organisations are worried about being inadvertently cau

defencecrimetechnology
71
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

New clause 3, tabled by the hon. Member for Cheltenham (Max Wilkinson), would require the Secretary of State to bring forward regulations designating the IRGC within a month of this Act coming into force, but the exercise of these powers under this Bill will have significant implications for national security and forei

defencecrimetechnology
435
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I have a great deal of respect for my right hon. Friend, as he knows, but in order for that to be the case, this Government would have to decide to designate the Cuba Solidarity Campaign. Obviously I cannot talk about what may or may not be designated should the Bill get on the statute book, but I think he is winding h

defencecrimetechnology
71
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. This Bill will create crucial new powers to allow the Government to keep pace with the evolving threat picture that Members from all parties referred to in the previous debates. The Bill will now move on to the other place, where I am sure colleagues will give it

defencecrimetechnology
73
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I note the hon. Lady’s point. Amendment 10 would “create an offence of engaging in conduct in preparation for committing, or assisting another to commit, an offence relating to a designated body.” It is not necessary, because a person who engages in conduct of any kind, including preparatory conduct, that is intended t

defencecrimetechnology
532
17 Jun 2026
intervention
National Security (State Threats) Bill

I think that there are some necessary differences between a terrorist organisation and a state-influenced or state proxy organisation, which the differences between the Bill and the National Security Act—which deals with terrorism—seek to bring out. Jonathan Hall said that the Bill “does the job” in closing that loopho

defencecrimetechnology
120
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I am more than happy to create a circumstance in which we can do that. I think there have been some misunderstandings about what protections are offered in the Bill, and some of the amendments seek to address gaps that are not actually there. However, I am more than happy to deal with that, and I will be in touch with

defencecrimetechnology
193
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I think it is about consistency. The Bill was drafted to try to mirror—albeit in a slightly different context—the Terrorism Act provisions, while fitting into the National Security Act’s provisions, so that we do not have a complicated range of tests. Amendment 7 relates to defences and sentencing. Essentially, the hon

defencecrimetechnology
164
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Action that is prejudicial to the safety and interests of the UK is the test that we are talking about. If one were delivering humanitarian aid and had to deal with part of a state that we did not particularly approve of, that would not be prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK. It would be in line with what

defencecrimetechnology
82
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I suspect that lawyers often use words like “likely”, because they are very rarely ready to commit to “absolutely”. Perhaps we need to deal with some of this in more detail in Committee, but we are assured that overseas activity will be covered in the interactions of this Bill, and case law makes that more likely. I am

defencecrimetechnology
259
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I thank all right hon. and hon. Members who have spoken in today’s Second Reading debate. We have had a very powerful and relevant debate, with a great deal of expertise in the Chamber from both sides of the House. State threats are overt or covert actions by foreign Governments that fall below the level of armed confl

defencecrimetechnology
738
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Yes. This is the test that delivers that assurance.

defencecrimetechnology
9
4 Jun 2026Cost of Fertiliser

We are working across Government to respond to the pressures created by the middle east conflict. I have asked the Competition and Markets Authority to consider industry concerns about fertiliser and we have increased the frequency of official fertiliser price reporting, which is now published weekly by the Agriculture

agriculturecost-of-livingeconomy-jobs
60
4 Jun 2026Cost of Fertiliser

May I point out that UK production of fertiliser using those processes was made reliant on America because the last Government decided to close the ammonia factory? In looking at resilience, the Chancellor has announced a business engagement exercise to consider whether targeting tariff cuts on fertiliser would be of a

agriculturecost-of-livingeconomy-jobs
57
4 Jun 2026Cost of Fertiliser

The Government are committed to ensuring that fertiliser markets work fairly for farmers and to strengthening resilience in the supply chain. We are ensuring that we can have a more reliable source of fertiliser and more efficient use in our own country, and we are doing a lot of work on this issue as I speak.

agriculturecost-of-livingeconomy-jobs
56
← PreviousPage 3 of 45 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.