The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 398 contributions

Speeches by McIntyre.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex McIntyre this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 398 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 20Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

As a former solicitor, I appreciate the hon. Member’s commitment to being paid at an hourly rate, given the speed of his contribution his afternoon. One of the points the Secretary of State made in support of this measure at the Dispatch Box was that the changing nature of our criminal justice system and the added dema

crimeeconomy-jobs
139
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I have some experience in this, having changed my practice when I was a solicitor from being a banking lawyer to being an employment lawyer. It takes time to build up a level of expertise, and if I were to return from this place to being a solicitor, it would take me some time to re-educate myself and get up to speed w

crimeeconomy-jobs
96
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I want to correct the record. This morning, I understood the Conservative party position to be that we are not allowed to call them victims at that point.

crimeeconomy-jobs
28
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Will the hon. Member give way?

crimeeconomy-jobs
6
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

This morning, we heard a passionate and important contribution from my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham Erdington about monitoring the proposals’ impact on minority communities. She has tabled an amendment so that we can discuss that question, and I look forward to debating it. Although I understand what the Minis

crimeeconomy-jobs
77
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The shadow Minister is making an articulate argument about how the criminal justice system might deal differently with different types of offenders, but would he not agree that someone’s background should not determine their guilt? They have either done it or they have not. Actually, someone’s good character and previo

crime
83
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

While we are on the subject of British values, is the Green party in Westminster’s position that criminals should go to jail? A Green party candidate in Scotland has said that they should close all the prisons in Scotland. Can she clarify the Green party’s position on that for the Committee?

crime
51
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

And parties, which seems to be happening at an increasing rate on the Opposition Benches. Does the shadow Minister not agree that, at the very least, it will take time for those barristers to reskill, retrain and update their knowledge to be able to take on those cases, and that therefore the premise that the Minister

crimeeconomy-jobs
63
13 Apr 2026SEND Provision and Reform

For too long, parents and carers in Gloucester have had to fight a broken system that was not delivering the best chance in life for their children. This Government inherited a SEND system that did not include parents and carers in the conversation, did not value their children and had led to a complete breakdown of tr

educationsocial-carelocal-government
645
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q If that was the case for Andrew, why not? You are making the point that this would create unfairness, but you have just said that there is unfairness at the Court of Appeal stage, so why is it not your position to remove it at that stage as well? Emma Torr: We are dealing with two different sets of processes. You are

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
147
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q In a case where somebody makes that appeal and says, “I was not advised and there was evidence that was not considered. I think there was a miscarriage of justice here,” are you saying that you have no faith that our Crown court judges would deal with that? We are not saying that a person cannot appeal, but there wou

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
305
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you for the amazing work you do for victims—it is a shame that respect is not being afforded across this room today. Victims are at the centre of this, and we should try to remember that in the debate. To bring it back to victims—you referred to this, Claire—the Bill makes changes to the bad character evidence.

crime
347
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you, Chair. I have had the privilege of listening to all of you speak before; thank you very much for being here. I think you were all here when Sir Brian Leveson was giving evidence earlier. He said that the only way to tackle delays was to do all three: reform, investment and modernisation. As victim-survivor

crime
113
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q I will ask a quick question for clarification before I ask my substantive question. Ms Karmy-Jones, thank you, but I am a simple employment solicitor, so apologies, but for full transparency, will you confirm something? According to the Institute for Government, barristers may be reluctant to replace Crown court case

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
91
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Just as a general ballpark figure— Riel Karmy-Jones: It is less, yes.

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
12
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q I will come on to my substantive question then, because I have not got much time. You said that we should not remove the right to elect, as juries act as a safeguard against prejudice, but 90% of cases are already heard without a jury. I suggest that those cases have no safeguards against prejudice. Building on that,

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
133
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q A quick question: building on the Minister’s questions, where would you draw the line on this? You mentioned the criminal damage cases, and I can understand your argument there, but theft is an either-way offence. Let us say that somebody nicks a bottle of whisky from Tesco and says, “Actually, I’m protesting against

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
79
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Emma and Fiona, my questions are directed at you, and I will bring them together, even though they are on slightly different subjects. Emma, I am glad you raised the case of Andrew Malkinson, which was obviously a shocking miscarriage of justice. It is important to note that he had a jury trial at the Crown court, an

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
496
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Should we remove it at the Court of Appeal stage as well? Is that APPEAL’s position? Emma Torr: No, that is not APPEAL’s position.

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
25
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q We only have 30 seconds. Where would you draw the line? If someone says, “I’ve stolen a bottle of whisky to protest against Tesco,” would they be included in the cases you are talking about? Tim Crosland: If they argued that they acted in the public interest, then potentially, yes, but drawing that line—

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
55
← PreviousPage 4 of 20 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.