The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 794 contributions

Speeches by Davies-Jones.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex Davies-Jones this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 101120 of 794 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 6 of 40Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes.

1
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

My understanding, Chair—I will refer to officials if this is not the case—is that these individuals have been told, but they have not been told that they are completely out of scope. They have not been told that they have been judged totally out of scope. All we have told them is that there is currently not enough evid

80
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

We can only be sure about the evidence we currently have, Chair. On the basis of the evidence that we have had available to us as the Ministry of Justice, 574 out of that 1,002 have been told that they are eligible and within scope. However, those who have been written to and told they are not in scope have not been to

101
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes, and I am aware of that. I did say to officials that, if the case was brought up and Mrs Eaton discussed her case, I would feel obliged to respond. Mrs Eaton’s case is a prime example of how the data has failed us and we have had to get more data and evidence for the case. My understanding is that Mrs Eaton was tol

113
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

I am very conscious not to talk about individual claims here.

11
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes.

1
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Well, I would accept that one person who has had to go through the arduous issue of having to provide more information is one too many. However, as you will be aware, the requirements of the Act are quite strict and therefore quite limiting on us as the Ministry of Justice. Anyone who feels like their application has b

87
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes, that is correct, so it is out of the 1,002—around 3%.

12
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

It is an error rate of around 3%—around 30 people out of the 1,002.

14
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes, and to date there have been none relating to Capture.

11
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

That is correct. However, Mrs Eaton was not included in that figure. She has now been added to it.

19
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Numbers or more evidence showing that that was not the case, as was the case in Horizon. As I said, over 100 were overturned by the courts.

27
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

When Parliament took the unprecedented decision to legislate to overturn the convictions following Horizon, it was because it was an exceptional situation. Over 100 cases had been overturned in the courts before Parliament took the unique position to legislate for this. It would be quite the constitutional stretch to d

164
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

The compensation is paid from DBT; we are in charge of quashing convictions, so I will pass that over to my colleague.

22
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes.

1
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

No.

1
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Under the scheme regarding the Horizon legislation quashing the convictions, the Ministry of Justice, as of October last year, had identified 1,002 individuals who are eligible and within scope of the legislation. Out of those 1,002, we have written to 574 individuals to inform them that they have at least one convicti

161
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes, potentially, and those individuals are self-identifying. They are coming forward themselves and coming through to us, and they are being assessed individually.

23
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

There are.

2
6 Jan 2026Business and Trade Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1589)

Yes.

1
← PreviousPage 6 of 40 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.