The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 804 contributions

Speeches by Davies-Jones.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex Davies-Jones this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 221240 of 804 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 12 of 41Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

We talk about focusing minds. The Bill will clearly focus minds, because a chief executive can face criminal prosecution and potentially prison if they are not candid, if they consent or connive with someone not being candid, or if they fail to take all reasonable steps to ensure that the authority is candid. Those are

local-governmentother
274
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the withdrawal of the amendments. We had a discussion earlier about why we have not listed organisations in the Bill. We did not want it to be an exhaustive list and to miss an organisation out unintentionally, which could lead them to think that the Bill does not apply to it. We have been extremely clear tha

local-governmentother
377
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

The clause provides that the duty of candour and assistance will apply to inquiries and investigations that are already ongoing at the time of commencement, as well as those that start afterwards. It may be necessary to set out further transitional provisions in the commencement regulations to ensure that ongoing inqui

local-governmentother
290
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I have seen them.

local-governmentother
4
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

He will be part of the discussion.

local-governmentother
7
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Third sitting)

I sincerely thank my hon. Friend for his amendment, which seeks to lower the mental standard threshold from intent to include recklessness for the purposes of the offence of failing to comply with the duty. Recklessness already applies to breaches of the obligations in clause 2(4) and (5), so the amendment would extend

crimesocial-caremp-performance
235
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

Again, I totally agree with the policy intention. If the Bill had become an Act when the covid inquiry was under way, might that inquiry have carried things out differently, or provided information in a new way or in a new light? We cannot answer that. All I can say is that the purpose and intention of the Bill is to e

local-governmentother
109
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

The information provided to the inquiry would be covered and, as per the provisions of this Bill, subcontractors would be caught under the duty of candour and would have to disclose any relevant information, as per the information disclosed in that Act. I hope that clarifies it.

local-governmentother
47
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

My right hon. Friend makes a very important point: it is for each individual organisation to determine the policies and procedures for their record keeping. It might be wholly appropriate for one organisation, if it has a small number of employees, to use a WhatsApp group, but we would expect records to be kept appropr

local-governmentother
158
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I recognise that concern, which I share, and we are looking at that in terms of the passage of the Bill. As I have stated, the duty would be on the public authority, official or subcontractor to disclose all the information to the chair of the inquiry or investigation.

local-governmentother
49
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am happy to do that.

local-governmentother
6
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will happily come back to the hon. Gentleman. Say, for example, that someone in the police force believes that a colleague is not acting in accordance with the code of ethics, but that individual may not be privy to the details of an undercover operation that their colleague is aware of and they are cutting across ex

local-governmentother
164
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for tabling his amendment. The Government believe it is imperative to have policies and processes in place to enable officials and public servants to speak up when they see that something is wrong. If we are to address the culture change that we have heard about a hundred times, it is importa

local-governmentother
202
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank both hon. Members for tabling the amendments in this group; I will respond to each in turn. First, amendment 28 would require there to be a standard template for a code of ethics. The Government recognise the importance of supporting public authorities to develop their codes of ethical conduct, and we commit to

local-governmentother
803
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising an important issue. Amendment 43 would, as he states, make authorities set expectations for staff on how to retain and disclose their digital records in accordance with the obligations under the duty of candour. Proper record keeping is important to ensure accountability and propr

local-governmentother
356
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Third sitting)

I totally agree. I am absolutely reassured that the Bill, as drafted, does just that. It ensures that there is criminal liability on the head of a public authority to ensure that everything is covered. However, as I have already stated, when something goes wrong in an NHS setting and we know that something has gone wro

crimesocial-caremp-performance
102
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

And that is the very confusion the hon. Lady mentioned. If she lets me finish my point, I will give way. Amendment 50, for example, may lead some people who work for a public authority, but are not workers, to believe that their disclosure may qualify for whistleblowing protection under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

local-governmentother
87
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Third sitting)

I genuinely do not think that we have crossed wires here. The intention of the Bill is the same as that of the amendments; it is just about how we are doing this. Our approach holds the heads of authorities and the heads of all public organisations accountable for the things that they can reasonably be expected to do o

crimesocial-caremp-performance
214
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

The hon. Lady has pre-empted my next comments. The Bill will ensure that workers who are protected against retaliation by an employer for blowing the whistle about wrongdoing—known formally as making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996—are more aware of their rights. We believe that certain elem

local-governmentother
88
2 Dec 2025Public Office (Accountability) Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank Members for raising those important points. We discussed whistleblowers and the protections needed for them a lot in the oral evidence sessions. It is essential that if there is wrongdoing in an organisation, those working for the organisation can come forward and raise the alarm, and be confident that they wil

local-governmentother
103
← PreviousPage 12 of 41 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.