Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -49 | 1% on-whip · 295 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +50 | 100% on-whip · 91 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +1 | 51% on-whip · 54 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 38 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +5 | 55% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | 0 | 50% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | 0 | 50% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Jul 2026 | Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 3 Aye: Support Amendment 3 to the Public Office (Accountability) Bill, proposing a change to how the bill holds public officeholders to account · No: Oppose Amendment 3, preferring the bill as it stood without this particular change to public office accountability provisions | 91 | 324 | No |
| 14 Jul 2026 | Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 199 Aye: Support Amendment 199 to the Public Office (Accountability) Bill, the nature of which cannot be determined without debate transcripts · No: Oppose Amendment 199 to the Public Office (Accountability) Bill, with the large No majority suggesting this reflects the government's position against the proposed change | 103 | 405 | No |
All 2 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Parliamentary Scrutiny” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.