The topic lensIssue · 2 divisions tagged · 8 parties active

Online Safety.

Online harms and platform regulation

Divisions tagged
2
This parliament
Parties active
8
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Independent
57% aligned
Recent activity
2
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on online safety.2 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
+353% on-whip · 335 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-500% on-whip · 92 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
-248% on-whip · 71 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyInd
+353% on-whip · 38 MPs
IndependentInd
+757% on-whip · 11 MPs
Scottish National PartySNP
-1238% on-whip · 9 MPs
Democratic Unionist PartyDUP
050% on-whip · 4 MPs
Plaid CymruPlaid
050% on-whip · 4 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent online safety divisions.last 2 · of 2 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
24 Feb 2026Opposition Day: Protections for children from online harms
Aye: Support the opposition's call for stronger or more urgent action to protect children from online harms, beyond what the government is currently doing · No: Reject the opposition's motion, defending the government's existing approach to child online safety — likely arguing current legislation (such as the Online Safety Act) is sufficient or that the motion is politically motivated
70282No
12 Feb 2025Draft Online Safety Act 2023 (Category 1, Category 2A and Category 2B Threshold Conditions) Regulations 2025
Aye: Support bringing these threshold regulations into force, implementing the Online Safety Act's categorisation system for platforms and extending child safety protections online · No: Oppose these specific threshold regulations, arguing they fail to follow the Act's intention by not using risk-based criteria for smaller but high-harm sites, leaving dangerous platforms outside the strictest obligations
320178Yes

All 2 divisions on this issue →

§ 04Where online safety money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Online Safety” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 2 divisions