Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | 0 | 50% on-whip · 267 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -1 | 49% on-whip · 99 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | 0 | 50% on-whip · 34 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | -14 | 36% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | 0 | 50% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amendment Aye: Support the government's amended position on defence spending and readiness, replacing the opposition's original motion with the Prime Minister's preferred wording · No: Back the original opposition motion on defence spending and readiness, rejecting the government's counter-amendment | 292 | 112 | Yes |
| 23 Jun 2026 | Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness Aye: Support the opposition's position that defence spending and military readiness require greater or more urgent government action than current plans provide. · No: Reject the opposition motion, defending the government's existing approach to defence investment and military capability as adequate or on the right trajectory. | 107 | 307 | No |
All 2 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Military Security” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.