Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 238 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -50 | 0% on-whip · 56 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | +50 | 100% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | -33 | 17% on-whip · 6 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Apr 2026 | Children's School and Wellbeing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 38V to 38X Aye: Support the government's position on Lords Amendments 38V to 38X, whether accepting or rejecting specific Lords changes to the Bill · No: Oppose the government's position on Lords Amendments 38V to 38X, backing an alternative approach to the provisions in question | 273 | 66 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Mental Health in Schools” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.