Infrastructure Investment.
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 240 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 89 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -50 | 0% on-whip · 58 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +10 | 60% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Jun 2026 | Railways Bill: Third Reading Aye: Support bringing Britain's railways into public ownership under Great British Railways, with the state as the directing mind for the network, putting passengers and freight growth ahead of private operators. · No: Oppose the Bill's model of rail renationalisation, raising concerns about Great British Railways simultaneously operating services and controlling network access, and the risk to independent open-access operators like Hull Trains. | 279 | 151 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Infrastructure Investment” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.