Homelessness and Housing Support.
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +48 | 98% on-whip · 272 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | +50 | 100% on-whip · 33 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | -50 | 0% on-whip · 9 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | -17 | 33% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2026 | Draft Immigration and Asylum (Provision of Accommodation to Failed Asylum-Seekers) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support tightening asylum support rules by allowing suspension of accommodation and financial assistance where asylum seekers work illegally, and removing the blanket duty to provide support in all cases. · No: Oppose the regulations as inadequate or harmful — either because they do not go far enough to deter illegal immigration, or because they remove support from vulnerable people without granting asylum seekers the right to work. | 305 | 30 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Homelessness and Housing Support” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.