Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 288 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 83 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 54 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 35 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 6 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Jul 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill: motion to agree to Lords Amendment 1 Aye: Support accepting the Lords' amendment to the National Security (State Threats) Bill · No: Oppose the Lords' amendment, preferring the Bill as it stood before the Lords changed it | 394 | 86 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Counter-terrorism” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.