Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 274 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 55 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | -50 | 0% on-whip · 33 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 9 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +17 | 67% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2026 | Draft Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support tightening asylum support rules by giving ministers power to withdraw assistance from those who breach conditions, as part of a firmer but fairer asylum framework. · No: Oppose the regulations as punitive measures that risk destituting vulnerable asylum seekers without addressing root causes, such as the ban on working, that force people into illegal activity. | 308 | 84 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Asylum Rights” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.