Non-inquiry session · Opened 27 August 2025
National Highways and environmental sustainability
From: Environmental Audit Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Can National Highways deliver on environmental commitments, specifically around tree planting survival rates and pollution control from road runoff? The inquiry examines whether the company has the expertise, monitoring systems, and regulatory oversight to meet biodiversity net gain targets and prevent toxic highway pollution entering UK waterways.
Status / emerging findings
- Only 53% of ecological mitigation commitments are delivered; 73% of failures involve missing woodland planting. The A14 scheme saw 45% tree mortality (160,000 trees) due to basic execution failures like poor timing, inadequate watering, and wrong species for exposed sites.
- Highway pollution is almost entirely unregulated: the Environment Agency has issued zero permits for highway discharge despite statutory responsibility. Every water sample from National Highways schemes fails environmental quality standards for hydrocarbons.
- Of 25,000 highway outfalls, only 126 are targeted for treatment by 2030. Existing mitigation designs are undersized: M6 vortex separators remove only 40% of suspended solids versus required standards.
- Local planning authorities lack ecological expertise (only one-third have in-house skills) to monitor compliance. National Highways' post-operational monitoring is severely deficient: only 1 of 20 projects reviewed showed adequate oversight.
- Replanting trials using proper horticultural practice (plug plants, mulch, watering) achieved under 15% dieback, proving the original A14 failures were preventable with standard knowledge.
Why it matters
National Highways controls one of the UK's largest infrastructure portfolios; systemic failures in tree planting and pollution control undermine climate adaptation, biodiversity targets, and water quality across England—yet regulatory oversight is nearly absent.
Tone arc
Opened procedurally but turned sharply adversarial after expert witnesses (Woodland Trust, Kew Gardens, Environment Agency) revealed systematic failures. National Highways' CEO conceded basic horticultural mistakes and regulatory gaps, shifting from defensive to commitments to improve.
Themes
Key witnesses
Nicole Hillier (Woodland Trust), Kevin Martin (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew), Jo Bradley (Stormwater Shepherds, formerly Environment Agency), Catherine Moncrieff (Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management), Nick Harris (National Highways Chief Executive), Stephen Elderkin (National Highways Director of Environmental Sustainability)
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 3 September 2025 · HC 1284
Session 1 of 3Oral evidence · 3 September 2025 · HC 1284
Session 2 of 3Oral evidence · 3 September 2025 · HC 1284
Session 3 of 3
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 24 April 2026
Correspondence · 5 December 2025
Correspondence · 3 November 2025
Correspondence · 22 October 2025
Correspondence · 22 October 2025
Correspondence · 16 September 2025
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Toby Perkins MP·6 references
- National Highways·5 references
- Environmental Audit Committee·3 references
- Nick Harris·3 references
- Department for Transport·3 references
- Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP·1 reference
- Simon Lightwood·1 reference
- Heidi Alexander MP·1 reference
- Cambridgeshire County Council·1 reference
- Olivia Blake MP·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗