Inquiry · Opened 10 November 2025
Transition to State Pension age
From: Work and Pensions Committee
What this inquiry is asking
This inquiry examines how the UK's rising state pension age affects different groups, whether current government support for older workers is adequate, and how to balance fiscal sustainability with fairness. The committee is testing whether the Government's approach to pension policy—including its independent review of state pension age—properly accounts for regional health inequalities, employment barriers for disabled and older workers, and the adequacy of retirement income for vulnerable groups.
Status / emerging findings
- Nearly 24% of over-50s leave work before state pension age due to unmet health support needs, signalling a structural gap between policy intent and workers' capacity to stay employed
- Healthy life expectancy varies by up to 20 years across UK regions (Wokingham 69 years vs Blackpool 51 years), meaning state pension age rises disproportionately harm deprived areas with declining life expectancy
- One in eight pensioners rely entirely on state pension, yet the Pensions Commission's focus on private savings risks overlooking this cohort's need for adequate basic pension levels
- Pension credit take-up jumps from 3% to 35% with targeted outreach, but DWP data-sharing delays to 2027 perpetuate avoidable poverty among low-income pensioner households
- Employment support frameworks neglect small and medium enterprises and fail to address systemic ageism and disablism; women face compounded pension inequality via lower defined-contribution values
Why it matters
State pension age changes shape whether millions of people can afford to retire; this inquiry is testing whether current policy risks pushing vulnerable workers into poverty or forcing them into ill-health by requiring work they cannot sustain.
Tone arc
Started procedural and consensual; shifted toward critical after the January and March evidence sessions revealed structural failures in DWP support and persistent regional inequalities that government policy does not adequately address.
Themes
Key witnesses
Torsten Bell MP (Minister for Pensions), Sarah Vickerstaff (academic, pension transitions), David Finch (think-tank policy analyst), Chris Curry (retirement income researcher), Morgan Vine (Age UK), Professor Wendy Loretto (university researcher, older workers), Jonathan Cribb (Institute for Fiscal Studies), Cathy Payne (DWP official)
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 10 December 2025 · HC 1482
Session 1 of 4Oral evidence · 28 January 2026 · HC 1482
Session 2 of 4Oral evidence · 18 March 2026 · HC 1482
Session 3 of 4Oral evidence · 25 March 2026 · HC 1482
Session 4 of 4
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 22 April 2026
Correspondence · 21 January 2026
Correspondence · 16 January 2026
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Department for Work and Pensions·3 references
- Debbie Abrahams MP (Chair, Work and Pensions Committee)·2 references
- Torsten Bell MP (Minister for Pensions)·1 reference
- Dr Suzy Morrissey (Independent State Pension age review author)·1 reference
- Policy in Practice·1 reference
- Office for National Statistics·1 reference
- Paula Sussex (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman)·1 reference
- Liz Kendall MP (former Work and Pensions Secretary)·1 reference
- Pat McFadden (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions)·1 reference
- Paula Sussex·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗