Inquiry · Opened 5 November 2025

Railways Bill

From: Transport Committee

Open7 documents9 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

The inquiry examines the Railways Bill, which proposes to create Great British Railways (GBR)—a single state-owned organisation combining track and train operations to replace the current fragmented rail system. The committee scrutinised whether the Bill's governance structure, accountability mechanisms, passenger protections, devolved arrangements, and retail competition safeguards will actually deliver better railways for passengers and value for taxpayers.

Status / emerging findings

  • Committee supports the Bill's core principle of integrating track and train under one body, but identified critical gaps: GBR's detailed corporate structure, licence terms, and regulatory enforcement mechanisms remain undefined and must be published during passage
  • Secretary of State retains ultimate control via 'mandatory directions' if GBR breaches duties, creating tension between the Government's 'arm's-length' framing and centralised ministerial power—committee recommended this be used only 'sparingly' and enshrined in law
  • Passenger protections are weak: the duty to 'promote disabled passenger interests' lacks measurable targets or enforcement teeth; committee found the Bill accounts for only ~30% of what's needed, with rest dependent on unpublished secondary legislation
  • Ticket retail competition threatened: Trainline controls ~30% of sales (above CMA monopoly threshold); witnesses warned GBR's vertical integration poses conflict-of-interest risks unless structural separation is mandated
  • Devolution arrangements formalised but fragile: Scotland and Wales secured new consultation rights and governance roles, but both governments flagged that critical memoranda of understanding and asset-transfer mechanisms remain unlegislated

Why it matters

This Bill restructures how Britain's £15bn-a-year railway operates; it centralises power in a state body while weakening independent regulation and passenger protections, with critical safeguards left to unpublished secondary legislation and ministerial discretion.

Tone arc

Started procedurally focused on regulatory transition (ORR session, November), shifted sharply toward skepticism about passenger enforcement gaps and competitive fairness (December passenger advocacy and retail sessions), then became cooperative but conditional as devolved administrations demonstrated their models work (Scotland/Wales sessions, December), before final evidence session revealed officials' reliance on flexibility and post-legislation documents to solve governance detail.

Themes

regulatory-accountabilitypassenger-protectionticket-retail-competitiondevolved-governancestate-ownership

Key witnesses

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Rail Minister), Jeremy Westlake (Network Rail CEO), Fiona Hyslop MSP (Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Transport), Peter McDonald (Welsh Government Transport Director), Anthony Smith (Independent Rail Retailers Association), David Pitt (SilverRail Technologies), John Davies (Trainline), Alex Robertson (Transport Focus CEO)

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗