Non-inquiry session · Opened 2 February 2026

Review of Arts Council England

From: Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Open2 documents2 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

This inquiry examines whether Arts Council England (ACE) can successfully reform itself following Baroness Hodge's critical review. The committee is investigating ACE's response to recommendations about funding stagnation, bureaucratic barriers, regional inequality, and questions about its independence from government interference—and whether proposed reforms will actually restore sector confidence.

Status / emerging findings

  • ACE leadership accepted all Hodge review recommendations without resistance, committing to five priority reforms in year one including a new strategic framework and simplified grant processes
  • Baroness Hodge identified touring tax relief as the single most impactful fiscal intervention needed, and flagged £2 billion in funding plus £3 billion capital injection as necessary to address venue maintenance backlog
  • ACE acknowledged sector has lost confidence due to 15+ years of funding stagnation and bureaucratic processes, but defended contentious decisions (ENO relocation) as policy-driven rather than ministerial interference
  • Multiple theatre sector leaders (UK Theatre, regional venues) submitted correspondence in April 2026, signalling ongoing concerns about implementation despite leadership's stated commitment to reform
  • Hodge proposed a national freelancer support programme (£25k–£30k grants to 425–500 emerging creatives) fundable from existing budgets, but questioned whether diversity initiatives have moved beyond tokenism

Why it matters

Arts Council England controls public funding for culture; if reform fails, thousands of arts organisations, freelancers, and regional venues face continued financial precarity, and public access to theatre and culture outside London will shrink further.

Tone arc

Started critical in Hodge's March session—identifying systemic failures in funding, touring viability, and governance—then shifted to collaborative pragmatism in April when ACE leadership demonstrated acceptance of all recommendations and outlined detailed implementation plans, though sector correspondence suggests cautious scepticism about delivery.

Themes

funding-stagnationbureaucratic-reformregional-inequalitytouring-viabilityarm's-length-independencefreelancer-supportcapital-investment

Key witnesses

Baroness Hodge of Barking, Darren Henley CBE (ACE CEO), Sir Nicholas Serota (ACE Chair), Claire Walker (Society of London Theatre / UK Theatre), Hannah Essex (Society of London Theatre / UK Theatre), Vicky Cheetham (Leeds Heritage Theatres), Jon Gilchrist (Birmingham Hippodrome), Marianne Locatori (Newcastle Theatre Royal)

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗