Inquiry · Opened 7 March 2025

The UK-EU reset: rebuilding a strategic partnership in uncertain times

From: Foreign Affairs Committee

Open6 documents3 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

Can the UK rebuild a strategically valuable partnership with the EU after Brexit that delivers concrete benefits on security, defence, trade and prosperity—without surrendering regulatory autonomy or damaging the US relationship? The inquiry examines whether the Government's 'reset' agenda, launched at the May 2025 Lancaster House summit, is ambitious enough and properly implemented.

Status / emerging findings

  • Government accepted the reset framework but committee found implementation patchy: e-gates rolled out to only 50 ports (not major holiday destinations), fishing industry disputes cost-sharing claims, touring artists still face 90-in-180-day restrictions
  • Expert witnesses flagged government caution as a strategic weakness—the UK has leverage (Ukraine role, defence capabilities) but underuses it; EU Commission applies rigid precedent-based doctrine blocking bespoke deals
  • Regulatory alignment with EU could unlock 1.5–2.2% GDP growth and enjoys 53–66% public support, but creates hard trade-off: full alignment rules out a comprehensive US–UK FTA, forcing a choice on food standards and agriculture
  • SMEs disproportionately harmed by Brexit friction despite aggregate trade holding up; £841.7bn total trade with EU in 2025 masks structural problems for smaller firms
  • Government committed £360m fishing fund but has no concrete plan to pass SPS cost savings down supply chain; annual summit mechanism in place but specifics on unresolved issues (defence industrial cooperation, youth mobility) unclear

Why it matters

The UK's approach to the EU shapes security, jobs, and trade for every British citizen; the inquiry tests whether the reset is genuine strategic repositioning or symbolic repair work that leaves real barriers (red tape, artist touring, fisheries access) unsolved.

Tone arc

Began procedurally supportive of reset goal (April–May 2025), then sharpened criticism after ministerial evidence (September 2025) revealed patchy delivery and lack of strategic clarity; committee's final report (March 2026) balanced approval of framework with frustration at modest ambitions and implementation gaps.

Themes

uk-eu-strategic-partnershipregulatory-alignment-trade-offpost-brexit-implementationdefence-industrial-cooperationus-uk-eu-geopolitical-triangle

Key witnesses

Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP (Cabinet Office), Stephen Doughty MP (FCDO), Professor Anand Menon (King's College London), Professor Richard Whitman (Chatham House/University of Kent), Charles Grant (Centre for European Reform), Naomi Smith (Best for Britain), Professor David Paton (Nottingham University)

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗

The UK-EU reset: rebuilding a strategic partnership in uncertain times | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote