Non-inquiry session · Opened 16 March 2026
Royal Mail
From: Business and Trade Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Why has Royal Mail's letter delivery service collapsed to 76.5% on-time performance (target: 93%), what systemic failures caused this, and what regulatory and operational changes are needed to restore a functioning universal postal service? The inquiry examines whether private ownership, workforce crisis, and parcel-prioritisation strategies have made Royal Mail unable to fulfil its public obligation.
Status / emerging findings
- Royal Mail has missed delivery targets every year since 2022/23, with 220 million letters arriving late annually; first-class on-time delivery is 18.1 percentage points below target (74.9% vs 93%), affecting NHS appointments, court documents, and election materials
- 28,000 new postal workers hired since December 2022 have left the company, with 50% departing within first year due to £1.95/hour lower pay than legacy workers, creating severe retention crisis
- Management imposed a pyramid prioritisation system that systematically deprioritises letters in favour of parcels and tracked items, contradicting public statements that no such policy exists
- Ofcom fined Royal Mail £37 million over three years but service deteriorated; Ofcom is now lowering standards (reducing first-class target from 93% to 90%, second-class from 98.5% to 95%) rather than enforcing existing ones
- Owner Daniel Křetínský acknowledged service is 'not where we want it to be' but Royal Mail committed only £100 million annual investment against Ofcom estimate of £250–425 million needed
Why it matters
Royal Mail's collapse threatens 29% of UK adults (16 million people experienced Christmas delays in 2025), affecting critical services like NHS appointments and elections; the inquiry tests whether private ownership can sustain universal service or if radical reform is needed.
Tone arc
Committee began procedurally examining service statistics; rapidly shifted to adversarial after CWU evidence revealed management prioritisation system and workforce exodus, then intensified criticism of Ofcom for lowering standards rather than enforcing them.
Themes
Key witnesses
Daniel Křetínský (Royal Mail owner, EP Group), Dave Ward (CWU General Secretary), Martin Walsh (CWU), Natalie Black (Ofcom), Ian Strawhorne (Ofcom), Alistair Cochrane (Royal Mail), Citizens Advice, CMA (representing Royal Mail managers)
Reports & Government Responses
Report · 22 May 2026 · HC 131
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 24 March 2026 · HC 1796
Session 1 of 3Oral evidence · 24 March 2026 · HC 1796
Session 2 of 3Oral evidence · 24 March 2026 · HC 1796
Session 3 of 3
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 19 May 2026
Letter from Citizens Advice relating to Royal Mail session, 18 May 2026
Correspondence · 19 May 2026
Correspondence · 19 May 2026
Correspondence · 19 May 2026
Letter to Royal Mail relating to mail delivery performance, 30 April 2026
Correspondence · 22 April 2026
Correspondence · 15 April 2026
Correspondence · 15 April 2026
Correspondence · 15 April 2026
Correspondence · 15 April 2026
Correspondence · 27 March 2026
Letter to Ofcom relating to the Committee's evidence session on Royal Mail, 27 March 2026
Correspondence · 27 March 2026
Letter to EP Group relating to the acquisition of Royal Mail, 27 March 2026
Correspondence · 27 March 2026
Correspondence · 27 March 2026
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Ofcom·12 references
- Royal Mail·11 references
- Liam Byrne MP·8 references
- Business and Trade Committee·7 references
- Alistair Cochrane·6 references
- Communication Workers Union (CWU)·4 references
- Dave Ward·4 references
- EP Group·4 references
- Liam Byrne·3 references
- Daniel Křetínský·3 references
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗