Inquiry · Opened 3 July 2025

Housing Conditions in England

From: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Open15 documents6 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

This inquiry examines why hundreds of thousands of homes across England—in the social rented sector, temporary accommodation, and new builds—fail basic safety and decency standards, and whether government reforms (Awaab's Law, the new Decent Homes Standard, rental reforms) will actually fix the problem or just shuffle it around. The committee is investigating the scale of poor conditions, what causes them, and whether the regulatory and financial systems are fit to deliver the stated ambitions.

Status / emerging findings

  • Nearly 430,000 social homes still fail the existing Decent Homes Standard; very little progress since the pandemic despite policy commitments. New standard won't be fully implemented until 2035.
  • Temporary accommodation is a 'normalised emergency': record families in unsuitable housing, average stays exceeding two years, severe data gaps on conditions, and enforcement mechanisms largely toothless.
  • New builds: 35–40% of housing market operates outside quality standards frameworks; New Homes Ombudsman receives ~200 complaints monthly; water ingress and defects widespread; housing associations buying section 106 properties face identical problems as private buyers.
  • Private rental sector: over 40% of homes will be classified non-decent under revised standards; Awaab's Law implementation is delayed and underfunded; first-tier tribunal for rent challenge disputes is underutilised (70% of renters unaware).
  • Regulator of Social Housing lacks hard enforcement timescales; providers rated C4 (very serious failings) like London Borough of Newham—9,000 overdue fire safety actions, 40% homes untested electrically—face reputational pressure but no binding deadlines.

Why it matters

Millions of UK renters and tenants live in homes that are cold, unsafe, or unfit; the committee is testing whether the government's £billions in reform commitments will actually reach people or merely delay action by a decade while children develop in mouldy B&Bs and fire safety violations stack up.

Tone arc

Opened with procedural framing (what's the state of housing?); shifted sharply critical from September onwards after Marmot evidence on austerity harms and structural health inequalities. By January–February, tone became urgent and sceptical: witnesses described enforcement gaps, data blackholes, and timescales (2035) seen as unconscionable. Government response (April 2026) adopted defensive, optimistic tone ('decade of renewal'), triggering further committee scrutiny in May on new builds.

Themes

enforcement-gapenergy-efficiency-fuel-povertytemporary-accommodation-crisisregulatory-fragmentationtimescale-adequacy

Key witnesses

Florence Eshalomi, Committee Chair, Fiona MacGregor & Jonathan Walters, Regulator of Social Housing, Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman, Professor Michael Marmot, Institute of Health Equity, Crisis, Shared Health Foundation, Office of the Children's Commissioner, Shelter, Generation Rent, ACORN (housing advocacy orgs), New Homes Ombudsman Service, NHBC, Chartered Institute of Housing, Kwajo Tweneboa, housing campaigner

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗

Housing Conditions in England | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote