A divisionDivision No. 54 · Monday, 13 July 2026· Commons· Asylum

Immigration and Asylum Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

97Ayes
358Noes
Defeated · majority 261 · Government won
193 did not vote
Aye98No356DID NOT VOTE · 193

648 Members · Aye 97 · No 358 · DNV 193 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 13 July 2026 on a reasoned amendment (a formal motion objecting to a bill before it proceeds) to the Second Reading of the Immigration and Asylum Bill. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MPs, sought to block the bill from advancing on the grounds set out in the motion. It was defeated by 358 votes to 97, with the bill itself subsequently passing its Second Reading by 264 votes to 90 in a separate division the same day. The vote determined whether the Immigration and Asylum Bill could proceed to its next parliamentary stage. A successful reasoned amendment would have prevented the bill from advancing to committee, where its detailed provisions are examined line by line. The bill's passage to committee means its policies on asylum and immigration will now be scrutinised and potentially amended, but the government's core legislative programme on this subject moves forward. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 90 Conservative votes fell on the Aye side, joined by 6 Reform UK MPs and 2 independents, giving the amendment its 97 votes. Every Labour, Labour Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru, and Your Party member who voted opposed it. The Conservatives and Reform UK, though both opposing the bill, represent different critiques: media coverage has focused on the bill attracting hostility from those who believe it is too restrictive and from those who believe it does not go far enough, though the specific grounds of the Conservative amendment are grounded in their formal objection to the bill's Second Reading motion.

Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Immigration and Asylum Bill at Second Reading, signalling opposition to the bill's approach to immigration and asylum policy
Voting No meant
Oppose blocking the bill, backing its progression through Parliament — the government's position
§ 01Who voted how.455 voting Members · 193 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
249
111
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
50
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
8
Independent
2
5
6
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0