Draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026
368Ayes
107Noes
Carried · majority 261 · Government won175 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 368 · No 107 · DNV 175 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 18 March 2026, the House of Commons approved the Draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026 by 368 votes to 107. The result was announced as a deferred division -- meaning MPs had voted on a previous sitting day rather than immediately after a debate. These regulations make technical updates to existing investigatory powers legislation to bring it into line with the Employment Rights Act 2025. The regulations ensure that employment enforcement bodies have the legal tools necessary to investigate breaches of the new rights introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025. Without these consequential amendments, there could be gaps between the powers enforcers hold and the obligations the new law places on employers. The Employment Rights Act 2025 introduced a wide range of workplace protections -- including changes to sick pay entitlement and stronger day-one rights -- and these regulations are part of the machinery needed to make those protections enforceable in practice. Media coverage has focused on significant changes taking effect from April 2026, including reformed sick pay rules estimated to benefit around 15 million workers. The vote divided largely along party lines. All 271 Labour MPs voting, along with Labour and Co-operative members and smaller progressive parties including the Liberal Democrats, Greens, and Plaid Cymru, voted in favour. All 91 voting Conservatives, all five DUP members, and all five voting Reform UK MPs voted against. There was one Labour rebel voting No. The opposition's resistance likely reflects broader Conservative and Reform objections to the Employment Rights Act itself rather than specific concerns about investigatory powers procedure, with some retailers and employers groups having raised concerns about the economic impact of the wider legislation on youth employment.
Voting Aye meant
Support transferring investigatory and surveillance powers to the Fair Work Agency as a necessary consequence of merging labour enforcement functions into the new body
Voting No meant
Oppose granting the Fair Work Agency extensive surveillance powers, arguing they are disproportionate for a labour enforcement agency and represent state overreach
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
271
1
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
—
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0