Draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026
368Ayes
107Noes
Carried · majority 261 · Government won175 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 368 · No 107 · DNV 175 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 18 March 2026, MPs voted by 368 to 107 to approve the draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026. The regulations update the statutory references in the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 so that the new Fair Work Agency inherits the communications data powers previously held by the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority when the new agency becomes operational in April 2026. The vote matters because it clears the way for the Fair Work Agency to begin work with the investigatory tools it needs to pursue serious labour exploitation cases. The government presented the change as purely consequential: Parliament had already decided, through the Employment Rights Act 2025, to merge the GLAA's criminal enforcement functions into the new body, and this instrument simply updates the name in the relevant legislation so enforcement capability is not interrupted. Critics argued that while the GLAA's remit covered high-risk sectors such as agriculture and fishing, the Fair Work Agency covers every employer in the economy, meaning these surveillance-grade powers now apply far more broadly. The vote divided almost entirely on party lines. All 271 Labour MPs and 30 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the regulations, as did 55 Liberal Democrats, 3 Plaid Cymru members, and 3 Greens. All 91 voting Conservatives opposed it, joined by 5 Reform UK and 5 Democratic Unionist Party members and 3 independents. The Conservative shadow minister, Dame Harriett Baldwin, explicitly invited Liberal Democrats to join her side, but the Liberal Democrat spokesperson, Sarah Olney, declined and restated her party's support for the Fair Work Agency throughout the Employment Rights Bill's passage. There were no recorded rebels on the Labour benches.
Voting Aye meant
Support transferring existing GLAA investigatory powers to the new Fair Work Agency as a consequential and technical change, backing the wider project of consolidating labour market enforcement into one body
Voting No meant
Oppose the transfer on the grounds that extending surveillance-grade investigatory powers to a regulator covering the entire economy represents an overreach of state power into private business
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
271
1
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
54
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
—
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
The regulations are narrow, necessary and consequential, ensuring continuity of serious labour exploitation investigations without creating new powers or widening existing ones.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,915 words) →
The instrument disguises a significant expansion of state surveillance tools from the gangmaster sector to the entire economy, creating an unjustified super-regulator that will burden businesses and stifle entrepreneurship.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (675 words) →
The Fair Work Agency represents an important step toward unified labour enforcement that protects employee rights while reducing tribunal burdens; proportionate safeguards ensure powers are used appropriately.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (488 words) →
Businesses in her constituency are concerned that the Fair Work Agency will use these powers to overreach into legitimate business operations.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (79 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0