Draft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026
294Ayes
108Noes
Carried · majority 186 · Government won247 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 294 · No 108 · DNV 247 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 28 January 2026 to approve the Draft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026, passing the measure by 294 votes to 108. The regulations change the fees that pharmaceutical and medical device companies pay to the regulator when seeking approval or licensing for medical devices in the UK. As a deferred division -- a procedural arrangement where MPs vote at a scheduled later time rather than immediately after debate -- the result was announced by the Deputy Speaker. The fee changes affect the costs businesses face when bringing medical devices to market in the UK. Higher or restructured regulatory fees can influence how quickly new devices reach patients, how attractive the UK market is for manufacturers, and how well-resourced the regulator is to assess safety and efficacy. The vote advances the government's proposed framework for funding medical device regulation, with supporters arguing it ensures the regulator has adequate resources and opponents suggesting the new fee structure places excessive or poorly designed burdens on industry. The vote divided largely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided almost all of the 294 ayes, while the Conservatives supplied 91 of the 108 noes, joined by all six Reform UK MPs present, all five Democratic Unionist Party members, and representatives from the Traditional Unionist Voice and Ulster Unionist Party. Three Labour or Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against their own government's position, representing a small but notable dissent. The vote sits within a broader period of parliamentary activity on health regulation, following closely on divisions the previous day concerning the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill.
Voting Aye meant
Support updated medical device fee regulations, accepting the government's revised approach that attempts to balance regulatory funding with protecting SMEs in the life sciences industry
Voting No meant
Oppose the fee regulations, citing concerns about unpredictability of costs for businesses and the cumulative regulatory burden on medical device manufacturers
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
260
2
99
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
27
1
14
Independent
—
5
1
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
—
1
0
3
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0