Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 53
401Ayes
96Noes
Carried · majority 305 · Government won153 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 401 · No 96 · DNV 153 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 8 September 2025, the House of Commons voted 401 to 96 to reject Lords Amendment 53 to the Renters' Rights Bill. The amendment would have broadened possession Ground 4A to cover non-typical students, such as mature or postgraduate students living in self-contained one or two-bedroom properties, beyond the Bill's existing scope of full-time students in houses in multiple occupation (HMOs). By voting to disagree with the Lords, MPs kept Ground 4A narrowly drawn. The practical effect of this vote is to preserve the Bill's core shift from fixed-term to periodic tenancies for the wider student population. Ground 4A was designed specifically to protect the annual cycle of student lettings in HMOs, and the government argued that extending it to self-contained properties occupied by mature or postgraduate students would effectively reintroduce fixed-term arrangements for that group, undermining the tenancy security the legislation is built around. The vote keeps those renters within the same periodic tenancy framework that will apply to England's 11 million private renters more broadly. The division followed strict party lines. All 288 voting Labour MPs and all 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs supported the government motion, joined by all 60 Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Greens, and most independents. All 88 voting Conservatives and all 6 Reform UK MPs voted against, along with 2 independents. There were no notable cross-party rebels in either direction. This was one of several Lords amendments rejected on the same day, with comparable vote totals recorded across related divisions on amendments 11, 18, and 26.
Voting Aye meant
Support rejecting the Lords change, keeping Ground 4A narrowly focused on full-time students in HMOs and preserving the Bill's commitment to periodic tenancies for all other renters.
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment, extending the student possession ground to cover mature and postgraduate students in self-contained properties, effectively allowing fixed-term-style arrangements for that group.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
288
0
73
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
88
28
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
35
0
7
Independent
—
6
2
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government must reject most Lords amendments as they undermine core Bill principles; supports amendments on agricultural workers and maintains 12-month no-let restriction to prevent abuse.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,162 words) →
Bill is poorly thought through and counterproductive; will drive landlords out and reduce housing supply; Lords amendments attempt to address real problems the Government has created.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,220 words) →
Supports Bill's core aims but backs certain Lords amendments including those on shared owners (19), carers (64), and military housing (39) to improve fairness and accountability.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,366 words) →
Bill is groundbreaking and must be protected; opposes amendments that weaken discrimination enforcement and the 12-month no-let restriction; urges rapid implementation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (344 words) →
Bill essential to address sector imbalance; opposes amendments on standard of proof (26-27), pet deposits (11), and re-let periods (18) as they undermine tenant protections.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,319 words) →
Bill overdue; strongly opposes amendments on pet deposits (11), re-let periods (18), and standard of proof (26); backs military housing standard (39).Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,023 words) →
Bill's core principles must be preserved; opposes Lords amendments expanding eviction grounds and raising standard of proof; criticises Opposition for abandoning no-fault eviction commitment.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (687 words) →
Bill provides critical opportunity for survivors of domestic abuse; opposes amendments that weaken tenant protections and stability.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (197 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0