Draft Home Detention Curfew and Requisite and Minimum Custodial Periods (Amdt) Order 2024
424Ayes
106Noes
Carried · majority 318 · Government won120 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 424 · No 106 · DNV 120 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 10 December 2024 to approve the Draft Home Detention Curfew and Requisite and Minimum Custodial Periods (Amendment) Order 2024, passing it by 424 votes to 106. The order adjusts the rules governing when prisoners become eligible for release under home detention curfew, an electronic tagging scheme that allows some offenders to serve part of their sentence in the community, and alters the minimum and requisite custodial periods prisoners must complete before release can be considered. The vote advances the government's response to severe prison overcrowding in England and Wales. By amending the thresholds for home detention curfew eligibility and adjusting mandatory minimum time served, the order effectively allows a greater number of prisoners to be considered for early release sooner. It directly affects sentenced prisoners and the operational management of prison capacity, with knock-on implications for the Probation Service, which monitors offenders on tag. The division followed strict party lines. All 310 Labour MPs and 34 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the order, alongside all 64 Liberal Democrats, all 4 Green MPs, and all 3 Plaid Cymru MPs who voted. Against the order were 97 Conservatives, 5 DUP members, 3 Reform UK MPs, and 1 Ulster Unionist, with no Conservative or Reform UK member voting in favour. Two independents voted no and five voted aye. The Conservatives and their allies framed opposition around public safety and the principle of just punishment, while the government positioned the order as a necessary measure to manage an unsustainable prison population.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's changes to early release and home detention curfew eligibility as a necessary measure to manage prison capacity
Voting No meant
Oppose the changes to early release rules, likely on grounds that they are too lenient and undermine public safety or just punishment
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
310
0
51
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
97
19
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
34
0
8
Independent
—
6
2
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moved all four statutory instrument motions for approval on behalf of the government.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0