Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
350Ayes
108Noes
Carried · majority 242 · Government won186 did not vote
644 Members · Aye 350 · No 108 · DNV 186 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The Commons voted on 19 November 2024 to reject Lords Amendment 2 to the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill, by 350 votes to 108. The amendment, passed in the House of Lords, would have required the government and stakeholders to identify and consider relevant passenger performance data when carrying out the franchise transfers the bill provides for. The Commons motion to disagree with the Lords on this point passed comfortably. The vote means the bill proceeds without any requirement to weigh specific performance metrics before transferring train franchises from private operators to public sector companies. As franchises expire or are terminated, the government will be obliged to award contracts to publicly owned operators, regardless of how the incumbent private operator has been performing. Critics of the amendment's removal argued that good and poor performers alike will be brought into public ownership on the same terms, with no mechanism in the bill itself linking the sequencing or conditions of transfers to passenger satisfaction or service data. Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour of rejecting the Lords amendment, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and several independents. Conservatives voted unanimously against, joined by Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, and a small number of independents. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The vote sits within a series of divisions on the same bill, including a rejection of Lords Amendment 1 on the same day by 344 to 172, and earlier committee-stage defeats for similar amendments in September 2024, in which the government also won by large margins.
Voting Aye meant
Support rejecting the Lords amendment, backing full rail nationalisation without requiring performance data benchmarks to trigger franchise transfers — the government's position that all franchises should move to public ownership regardless of current operator performance.
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment, arguing that passenger performance data should be considered when deciding the sequencing or conditions of franchise transfers, putting passengers rather than ideology at the centre of the policy.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
297
0
64
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
94
22
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
—
5
4
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
2
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0