The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

York.

Labour Party-controlled unitary. £185m net revenue. 21 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats49 councillors · 21 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Websiteyork.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£185m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,175
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
25/49
Labour Party 51%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

York is a unitary controlled by Labour Party (25 of 49 seats). Net revenue is £185m for 2025-26. It covers 21 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.49 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 25LD 20Con 3Independent Berwick Hills Resident 1

Labour Party 51% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Jason RoseLabAcomb2023
Katie LomasLabAcomb2023
Michael NichollsConBishopthorpe2023
Danny MyersLabClifton2023
Margaret WellsLabClifton2023
Danny MyersLabClifton2019
Chris StewardConCopmanthorpe2023
Ashley MasonLDDringhouses Woodthorpe2023
Paula WiddowsonLDDringhouses Woodthorpe2023
Stephen FentonLDDringhouses Woodthorpe2023
Conrad James WhitcroftLabFishergate2023
Sarah WilsonLabFishergate2023
Showing 12 of 49·All 49 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

65%
Council tax
£120.2m · median 59%
27%
Central grants
£49.5m · median 30%
8%
Business rates
£15.1m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax unitary authoritie: 65% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (59%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,731
County / upper-tier£0
Police£321
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£107
Parish average£16
Total Band-D£2,175

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does York split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education32.9% of net spend · cohort median 36%
35 of 61-8% vs median
Adult Social Care30.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
11 of 61+14% vs median
Children's Services10.7% of net spend · cohort median 15%
56 of 61-28% vs median
Corporate & Central7.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
3 of 61+176% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.7% of net spend · cohort median 6%
30 of 610% vs median
Public Health3.0% of net spend · cohort median 4%
41 of 61-19% vs median
Highways & Transport2.6% of net spend · cohort median 3%
32 of 61-1% vs median
Housing & Homelessness2.2% of net spend · cohort median 2%
26 of 61+16% vs median
Planning & Economic Development2.0% of net spend · cohort median 1%
17 of 61+47% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.0% of net spend · cohort median 2%
36 of 61-7% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.23,117 payments · £100.7m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNCIL£3.38m3.4%69
JOHN SISK & SON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED£3.12m3.1%4
PATHFINDER MULTI ACADEMY TRUST£2.99m3.0%10
FIRST YORK LTD£2.73m2.7%75
CADDICK CONSTRUCTION LTD£2.15m2.1%11
MENCAP£2.06m2.0%302
WORK WITH YORK LIMITED£1.97m2.0%7
YORWASTE LTD£1.89m1.9%309
SEWELL EDUCATION (YORK) LTD£1.79m1.8%30
UNITED RESPONSE£1.60m1.6%579

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Highways And TransportJOHN SISK & SON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED£3.12m
Childrens ServicesPATHFINDER MULTI ACADEMY TRUST£2.97m
Adult Social CareCADDICK CONSTRUCTION LTD£2.15m
Corporate And CentralWORK WITH YORK LIMITED£1.97m
Housing And HomelessnessEXPLORE YORK LIBRARIES & ARCHIVES MUTUAL LTD£0.76m
Public HealthYORK & SCARBOROUGH TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST£0.57m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.21 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
York Outer1257% Luke ChartersLab
York Central943% Rachael MaskellInd
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
23,117 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level