Worcester.
Labour Party-controlled district. £12m net revenue. 7 wards across 1 parliamentary constituency.
31 May 2026
Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.
Worcester is a district controlled by Labour Party (10 of 15 seats). Net revenue is £12m for 2025-26. It covers 7 wards spanning 1 parliamentary constituencies.
Who sits in the chamber.
Labour Party 67% · last contested 2 May 2024
Councillors — the people.
| Councillor | Ward | Elected | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Lamb | Lab | Dines Green Grove Farm | 2024 |
| Robyn Diane Norfolk | Lab | Dines Green Grove Farm | 2024 |
| Atif Sadiq | Lab | Fort Royal | 2024 |
| Jabba Riaz | Lab | Fort Royal | 2024 |
| Andrew Cross | Grn | Leopard Hill | 2024 |
| Katie Collier | Grn | Leopard Hill | 2024 |
| Alan Amos | Con | Lower Wick Pitmaston | 2024 |
| Sue Smith | Lab | Lower Wick Pitmaston | 2024 |
| Jenny Barnes | Lab | St Johns | 2024 |
| Richard Udall | Lab | St Johns | 2024 |
| John Rudge | LD | St Nicholas | 2024 |
| Sarah Philippa Jane Murray | LD | St Nicholas | 2024 |
Where revenue comes from.
Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 60% council tax, 27% central grants.
Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)
Band-D bill.
| Council slice | £219 |
| County / upper-tier | £1,616 |
| Police | £292 |
| Fire & rescue | £102 |
| GLA precept | £0 |
| Parish average | £5 |
| Total Band-D | £2,234 |
Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish
Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.
How does Worcester split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.
The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.
Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.
| Constituency | Wards | % of council | Current MP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worcester | 16 | 229% | Tom Collins | Lab |
Sources, methods & last update
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
vs 163 other councils (district)
Police, Fire, Parish on top
Not yet ingested for Worcester
2023 boundaries
Pending ingest at LAD level