The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Wokingham.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled unitary. £184m net revenue. 9 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats24 councillors · 9 wards
Last election2 May 2024
Websitewokingham.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£184m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,376
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
14/24
Conservative and Unionist Party 58%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Wokingham is a unitary controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (14 of 24 seats). Net revenue is £184m for 2025-26. It covers 9 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.24 seats · last contested 2 May 2024

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 14LD 8Lab 2

Conservative and Unionist Party 58% · last contested 2 May 2024

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Adrian John BetteridgeLDBarkham Arborfield2024
George Daniel EvansConBarkham Arborfield2024
Joseph Michael BarleyConBarkham Arborfield2024
Alison SwaddleConBulmershe Coronation2024
Shahid Mohammed YounisConBulmershe Coronation2024
Yusra SalmanConBulmershe Coronation2024
Charles MargettsConFinchampstead2024
Peter Edward HarperConFinchampstead2024
Rebecca Jane MargettsConFinchampstead2024
Andy Ng Siu-hongLDMaiden Erlegh Whitegates2024
Norman JorgensenConMaiden Erlegh Whitegates2024
Stephen NewtonLDMaiden Erlegh Whitegates2024
Showing 12 of 24·All 24 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

82%
Council tax
£151.2m · median 59%
13%
Central grants
£24.7m · median 30%
4%
Business rates
£7.9m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax unitary authoritie: 82% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (59%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,931
County / upper-tier£0
Police£283
Fire & rescue£86
GLA precept£0
Parish average£75
Total Band-D£2,376

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Wokingham split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education39.6% of net spend · cohort median 36%
14 of 61+11% vs median
Adult Social Care28.8% of net spend · cohort median 27%
23 of 61+6% vs median
Children's Services11.9% of net spend · cohort median 15%
50 of 61-19% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.9% of net spend · cohort median 6%
26 of 61+3% vs median
Corporate & Central4.3% of net spend · cohort median 3%
8 of 61+51% vs median
Highways & Transport4.2% of net spend · cohort median 3%
11 of 61+60% vs median
Public Health1.9% of net spend · cohort median 4%
59 of 61-48% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.3% of net spend · cohort median 1%
34 of 61-4% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
52 of 61-42% vs median
Culture & Leisure0.9% of net spend · cohort median 2%
57 of 61-61% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.4,480 payments · £32.3m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Dec 2025

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
PUBLIC WORKS LOANS ACCOUNT£5.12m15.9%1
BALFOUR BEATTY GROUP LTD£3.01m9.3%1
OPTALIS LIMITED£2.49m7.7%48
VOLKER HIGHWAYS LTD£1.54m4.8%2
WATES RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED£1.10m3.4%2
READING BOROUGH COUNCIL£0.90m2.8%21
MATRIX SCM LTD£0.84m2.6%4
ADDINGTON SCHOOL (ASCENDANCY PARTNERSHIP TRUST)£0.70m2.2%262
ACORN CARE AND EDUCATION LTD£0.58m1.8%98
CONTRACT TRADING SERVICES LTD£0.55m1.7%3

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Corporate And CentralPUBLIC WORKS LOANS ACCOUNT£5.12m
Planning And EconomicBALFOUR BEATTY GROUP LTD£3.01m
Adult Social CareOPTALIS LIMITED£2.49m
Childrens ServicesADDINGTON SCHOOL (ASCENDANCY PARTNERSHIP TRUST)£0.70m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.9 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Wokingham’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Wokingham11122% Clive JonesLD
Earley and Woodley778% Yuan YangLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled unitary — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
4,480 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Dec 2025
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level