The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

West Oxfordshire.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £12m net revenue. 27 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats29 councillors · 27 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£12m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,444
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
13/29
Conservative and Unionist Party 45%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

West Oxfordshire is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (13 of 29 seats). Net revenue is £12m for 2025-26. It covers 27 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.29 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 13LD 11Green 3Lab 1Ref 1

Conservative and Unionist Party 45% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Edward Humfrey JamesConAlvescot Filkins2023
Jan LundLDAscott Shipton2026
Alaric Michael SmithLDBampton Clanfield2026
Rosie PearsonGrnBrize Norton Shilton2026
Nick Field-JohnsonConBurford2026
Simon WatsonConCarterton North East2026
Sarah EvansRefCarterton North West2026
Tammy AbarnoConCarterton South2026
Nigel Simon RidpathLDChadlington Churchill2024
Liz LeffmanLDCharlbury Finstock2024
Sandra June ColemanLDChipping Norton2026
Liam MackenzieConDucklington2026
Showing 12 of 29·All 29 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

53%
Council tax
£6.3m · median 61%
37%
Central grants
£4.4m · median 26%
11%
Business rates
£1.3m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 53% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£129
County / upper-tier£1,911
Police£283
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£120
Total Band-D£2,444

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does West Oxfordshire split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling50.6% of net spend · cohort median 32%
9 of 158+58% vs median
Corporate & Central39.7% of net spend · cohort median 27%
27 of 158+48% vs median
Planning & Economic Development10.1% of net spend · cohort median 14%
120 of 158-30% vs median
Housing & Homelessness3.5% of net spend · cohort median 14%
151 of 158-75% vs median
Highways & Transport1.5% of net spend · cohort median -2%
20 of 158
Culture & Leisure-5.5% of net spend · cohort median 13%
156 of 158-141% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.540 payments · £5.0m gross · 9 Dec 202529 Jan 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
PUBLICA GROUP (SUPPORT) LIMITED£1.49m29.6%3
UBICO LIMITED£1.47m29.1%7
OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.16m3.2%8
INSIDE OUT DEVELOPMENTS LTD£0.15m3.0%2
CAE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED£0.14m2.7%2
N&P CRAYFORD MRF LTD£0.13m2.6%3
WILSDON AND BUCKINGHAM£0.11m2.3%22
CONNOLLY & CALLAGHAN LIMITED£0.11m2.1%149
COMPUTERISED & DIGITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS LIMITED£0.10m2.1%2
OXFORD ENERGY ACADEMY LTD£0.07m1.4%1

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.27 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats

West Oxfordshire’s territory crosses 3 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Witney1763% Charlie MaynardLD
Banbury519% Sean WoodcockLab
Bicester and Woodstock519% Calum MillerLD
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 2 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
540 payments · 9 Dec 202529 Jan 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level