The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

West Lancashire.

Labour Party-controlled district. £15m net revenue. 15 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats43 councillors · 15 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£15m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,362
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
17/43
Labour Party 40%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

West Lancashire is a district controlled by Labour Party (17 of 43 seats). Net revenue is £15m for 2025-26. It covers 15 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.43 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 17Con 12Our West Lancashire 7Ref 7

Labour Party 40% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Anne Marie HughesIndAughton Holborn2026
Kerry Anne LloydLabAughton Holborn2024
Sarah E LawtonLabAughton Holborn2023
Alison JonesRefBurscough Bridge Rufford2026
Paul David HeskethIndBurscough Bridge Rufford2024
John GordonConBurscough Bridge Rufford2023
Jess RidingIndBurscough Town2026
Judy AbbottLabBurscough Town2024
Patricia Clare BurnsideLabBurscough Town2023
Thomas Andrew De FreitasConNorth Meols Hesketh Bank2026
Ian EcclesConNorth Meols Hesketh Bank2024
John HowardConNorth Meols Hesketh Bank2023
Showing 12 of 43·All 43 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

62%
Council tax
£9.3m · median 61%
25%
Central grants
£3.7m · median 26%
13%
Business rates
£1.9m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 62% council tax, 25% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£239
County / upper-tier£1,736
Police£277
Fire & rescue£90
GLA precept£0
Parish average£21
Total Band-D£2,362

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does West Lancashire split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central31.3% of net spend · cohort median 27%
53 of 158+17% vs median
Waste & Recycling28.1% of net spend · cohort median 32%
110 of 158-12% vs median
Planning & Economic Development27.2% of net spend · cohort median 14%
9 of 158+89% vs median
Culture & Leisure8.1% of net spend · cohort median 13%
123 of 158-40% vs median
Housing & Homelessness7.2% of net spend · cohort median 14%
136 of 158-49% vs median
Highways & Transport-1.9% of net spend · cohort median -2%
74 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.1,718 payments · £21.4m gross · 3 Dec 202530 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
TAWD VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED£3.69m17.3%4
RIBBLE VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL£3.45m16.1%4
WATES PROPERTY SERVICES LTD£3.43m16.0%103
PUBLIC WORKS LOAN BOARD£1.53m7.2%2
RIVERSIDE TRUCK RENTAL LTD£1.16m5.4%117
MATRIX SCM LTD£0.66m3.1%114
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING SERVICES (UK) LTD£0.62m2.9%6
LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.43m2.0%9
TA BROWNE CONTRACT SERVICES LTD£0.37m1.7%17
DIGITAL SERVICES LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.29m1.3%12

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.15 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
West Lancashire1387% Ashley DaltonLab
Southport213% Patrick HurleyLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
1,718 payments · 3 Dec 202530 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level