The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Watford.

Liberal Democrats-controlled district. £16m net revenue. 12 wards across 1 parliamentary constituency.

Typedistrict
Seats36 councillors · 12 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£16m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,343
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
32/36
Liberal Democrats 89%
Westminster
1
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, opposed area.

Watford is a district controlled by Liberal Democrats (32 of 36 seats). Net revenue is £16m for 2025-26. It covers 12 wards spanning 1 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.36 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 32Lab 4

Liberal Democrats 89% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Ian Alexander Eric StotesburyLDCallowland2026
Richard Peter ShortLDCallowland2024
Dawn Allen-WilliamsonLDCallowland2023
Aga DychtonLDCentral2026
Sam SummerLDCentral2024
Rabi MartinsLDCentral2023
Emil Anwar RoweLDHolywell2026
Nigel BellLabHolywell2024
Favour EzeifediLabHolywell2023
Monjuma RahmanLDLeggatts2026
Sham BegumLDLeggatts2024
Asif KhanLabLeggatts2023
Showing 12 of 36·All 36 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

69%
Council tax
£11.1m · median 61%
21%
Central grants
£3.3m · median 26%
10%
Business rates
£1.6m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax councils (district): 69% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (61%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£309
County / upper-tier£1,770
Police£265
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Total Band-D£2,343

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Watford split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central36.2% of net spend · cohort median 27%
37 of 158+35% vs median
Waste & Recycling27.4% of net spend · cohort median 32%
114 of 158-14% vs median
Culture & Leisure14.9% of net spend · cohort median 13%
60 of 158+11% vs median
Housing & Homelessness14.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
71 of 158+5% vs median
Planning & Economic Development4.4% of net spend · cohort median 14%
142 of 158-70% vs median
Highways & Transport2.5% of net spend · cohort median -2%
9 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.1,477 payments · £30.5m gross · 3 Dec 202530 Apr 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (UK) LTD£5.06m16.6%36
MORGAN SINDALL CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE£3.71m12.2%5
WORKMAN LLP£1.57m5.2%12
SLM LTD£1.30m4.3%3
MURRILL CONSTRUCTION LTD£1.17m3.9%62
ORION PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED£1.04m3.4%7
THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL£0.98m3.2%8
HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORIES (HSL)£0.78m2.5%1
SPORTS & LEISURE MANAGEMENT LTD (SLM)£0.67m2.2%5
NSL LIMITED£0.63m2.1%11

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.12 wards split across 1 parliamentary seat
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Watford12100% Matt TurmaineLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
1,477 payments · 3 Dec 202530 Apr 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level