The local authorityCouncil · metropolitan_borough · England · 1 of 36 councils (metropolitan_borough)

Wakefield.

Labour Party-controlled metropolitan_borough. £395m net revenue. 21 wards across 4 parliamentary constituencies.

Typemetropolitan_borough
Seats24 councillors · 21 wards
Last election2 May 2024
Websitewakefield.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£395m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,186
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
23/24
Labour Party 96%
Westminster
4
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Wakefield is a metropolitan_borough controlled by Labour Party (23 of 24 seats). Net revenue is £395m for 2025-26. It covers 21 wards spanning 4 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.24 seats · last contested 2 May 2024

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 23LD 1

Labour Party 96% · last contested 2 May 2024

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Martin RobertsLabAckworth North Elmsall Upton2024
Jackie FergusonLabAiredale Ferry Fryston2024
Les ShawLabAiredale Ferry Fryston2023
Josie PritchardLabAltofts Whitwood2024
Richard Anthony ForsterLabCastleford Central Glasshoughton2024
Faith HeptinstallLabCrofton Ryhill Walton2024
Maureen Tennant-KingLabFeatherstone2024
Laura JonesLabHemsworth2024
Jakob Matthew WilliamsonLabHemsworth2023
Darren ByfordLabHorbury South Ossett2024
Adele HayesLDKnottingley2024
Daniel WiltonLabNormanton2024
Showing 12 of 24·All 24 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

49%
Council tax
£193.2m · median 44%
39%
Central grants
£152.6m · median 41%
12%
Business rates
£49.1m · median 14%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (metropolitan_borough) median: 49% council tax, 39% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,802
County / upper-tier£0
Police£263
Fire & rescue£84
GLA precept£0
Parish average£36
Total Band-D£2,186

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)

How does Wakefield split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (metropolitan_borough)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education31.1% of net spend · cohort median 41%
32 of 35-23% vs median
Adult Social Care28.1% of net spend · cohort median 26%
8 of 35+9% vs median
Children's Services14.7% of net spend · cohort median 15%
22 of 35-3% vs median
Waste & Recycling8.1% of net spend · cohort median 4%
1 of 35+96% vs median
Public Health4.8% of net spend · cohort median 4%
7 of 35+12% vs median
Culture & Leisure4.2% of net spend · cohort median 2%
1 of 35+75% vs median
Corporate & Central3.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
11 of 35+27% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.9% of net spend · cohort median 2%
10 of 35+14% vs median
Highways & Transport1.7% of net spend · cohort median 2%
15 of 35+10% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.5% of net spend · cohort median 2%
20 of 35-3% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.21 wards split across 4 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Normanton and Hemsworth629% Jon TrickettLab
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley629% Yvette CooperLab
Wakefield and Rothwell524% Simon LightwoodInd
Ossett and Denby Dale419% Jade BotterillLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Wakefield
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level