The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Torridge.

Independent Berwick Hills Resident-controlled district. £10m net revenue. 16 wards across 1 parliamentary constituency.

Typedistrict
Seats37 councillors · 16 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£10m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,479
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
16/37
Independent Berwick Hills Resident 43%
Westminster
1
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Independent Berwick Hills Resident chamber, opposed area.

Torridge is a district controlled by Independent Berwick Hills Resident (16 of 37 seats). Net revenue is £10m for 2025-26. It covers 16 wards spanning 1 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.37 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Independent Berwick Hills Resident 16LD 8Con 6Green 4Lab 3

Independent Berwick Hills Resident 43% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Leonard Spencer FordIndAppledore2023
Peter Graham HamesGrnAppledore2023
Huw ThomasGrnBideford East2023
James Andrew CraigieIndBideford East2023
Jude GubbIndBideford East2023
Doug BushbyIndBideford North2023
Peter Stuart ChristieGrnBideford North2023
Trevor JohnsLDBideford North2023
David George BrentonLabBideford South2023
Simon George InchIndBideford South2023
Shirley LangfordLabBideford South2019
Anne BrentonLabBideford West2023
Showing 12 of 37·All 37 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

51%
Council tax
£5.0m · median 61%
33%
Central grants
£3.2m · median 26%
15%
Business rates
£1.5m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 51% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£195
County / upper-tier£1,801
Police£288
Fire & rescue£105
GLA precept£0
Parish average£90
Total Band-D£2,479

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Torridge split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling38.3% of net spend · cohort median 32%
42 of 158+20% vs median
Corporate & Central27.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
72 of 158+4% vs median
Planning & Economic Development15.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
66 of 158+10% vs median
Culture & Leisure13.4% of net spend · cohort median 13%
80 of 1580% vs median
Housing & Homelessness11.1% of net spend · cohort median 14%
108 of 158-21% vs median
Highways & Transport-6.4% of net spend · cohort median -2%
116 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.2,036 payments · £7.2m gross · 4 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
BAM CONSTRUCTION LTD£1.89m26.1%4
DEVON CONTRACTORS LTD£0.81m11.2%2
ACTIVE TORRIDGE LTD£0.28m3.9%8
KENT COUNTY COUNCIL£0.26m3.6%14
AHR ARCHITECTS LTD£0.23m3.2%7
MRI COMMUNITY SOFTWARE LTD£0.14m1.9%14
COMENSURA LTD£0.13m1.8%70
IDOX SOFTWARE LTD£0.12m1.7%2
***DP*** TDC DEVON HOUSEHOLD SUPPORT FUND£0.09m1.3%133
BISHOP FLEMING AUDIT LIMITED£0.08m1.2%3

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.16 wards split across 1 parliamentary seat
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Torridge and Tavistock16100% Geoffrey CoxCon
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
2,036 payments · 4 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level