The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Test Valley.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £15m net revenue. 20 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats44 councillors · 20 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£15m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,197
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
26/44
Conservative and Unionist Party 59%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Test Valley is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (26 of 44 seats). Net revenue is £15m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.44 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 26LD 18

Conservative and Unionist Party 59% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Sally YaldenLDAmpfield & Braishfield2023
Chris DonnellyConAndover Downlands2023
Nick LodgeConAndover Downlands2023
Carl Stephen Borg-NealConAndover Harroway2023
Luigi GregoriLDAndover Harroway2023
Robin HughesLDAndover Harroway2023
Jim NealConAndover Millway2023
Mark Alan LeechConAndover Millway2023
Zilliah Helena BrooksConAndover Millway2023
Jason Lloyd SangsterLDAndover Romans2023
Katie Louise BrooksConAndover Romans2023
Kirsty NorthConAndover Romans2023
Showing 12 of 44·All 44 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

60%
Council tax
£9.2m · median 61%
30%
Central grants
£4.6m · median 26%
9%
Business rates
£1.4m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 60% council tax, 30% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£176
County / upper-tier£1,610
Police£275
Fire & rescue£88
GLA precept£0
Parish average£48
Total Band-D£2,197

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Test Valley split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Planning & Economic Development25.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
14 of 158+78% vs median
Corporate & Central25.0% of net spend · cohort median 27%
94 of 158-7% vs median
Waste & Recycling23.2% of net spend · cohort median 32%
140 of 158-27% vs median
Culture & Leisure16.4% of net spend · cohort median 13%
47 of 158+23% vs median
Housing & Homelessness10.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
113 of 158-24% vs median
Highways & Transport-1.0% of net spend · cohort median -2%
62 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.3,458 payments · £12.4m gross · 4 Dec 202530 Apr 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
ERITH CONTRACTORS LIMITED£1.06m8.6%5
VIVID HOUSING LTD£0.70m5.6%1
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.45m3.6%26
NURSLING & ROWNHAMS P C£0.44m3.6%6
KIER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LTD.£0.36m2.9%7
TRIDENT STRUCTURAL REPAIR SPECIALISTS LTD£0.35m2.8%4
ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY£0.30m2.4%7
ARTHUR J GALLAGHER£0.28m2.2%7
ATLAS FM LTD£0.26m2.1%197
KIER VENTURES LTD£0.25m2.0%4

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.20 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats

Test Valley’s territory crosses 3 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Romsey and Southampton North1260% Caroline NokesCon
North West Hampshire735% Kit MalthouseCon
Eastleigh15% Liz JarvisLD
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 2 Con and 1 LD MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
3,458 payments · 4 Dec 202530 Apr 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level