The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Telford and Wrekin.

Labour Party-controlled unitary. £199m net revenue. 32 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats57 councillors · 32 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Websitetelford.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£199m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,146
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
40/57
Labour Party 70%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Telford and Wrekin is a unitary controlled by Labour Party (40 of 57 seats). Net revenue is £199m for 2025-26. It covers 32 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.57 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 40Con 9LD 6Independent Berwick Hills Resident 2

Labour Party 70% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Kim TonksLDAdmaston Bratton2023
Karen BlundellLDApley Castle2023
Angela McClementsLabArleston College2023
Lee CarterLabArleston College2023
Arnold Richard Hugh EnglandLabBrookside2023
Jackie LoveridgeLabBrookside2019
Andrew John EadeConChurch Aston Lilleshall2023
Andy BurfordLabDawley Aqueduct2023
Lyndsey ParkerLabDawley Aqueduct2023
Jane PinterLabDawley Aqueduct2019
Fiona DoranLabDonnington2023
Ollie VickersLabDonnington2023
Showing 12 of 57·All 57 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

47%
Council tax
£93.3m · median 59%
39%
Central grants
£78.3m · median 30%
14%
Business rates
£27.7m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy unitary authoritie: 47% from council tax vs the cohort median of 59%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,614
County / upper-tier£0
Police£292
Fire & rescue£119
GLA precept£0
Parish average£122
Total Band-D£2,146

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Telford and Wrekin split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education39.3% of net spend · cohort median 36%
17 of 61+10% vs median
Adult Social Care26.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
36 of 61-1% vs median
Children's Services15.0% of net spend · cohort median 15%
30 of 61+2% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.8% of net spend · cohort median 6%
28 of 61+1% vs median
Public Health4.1% of net spend · cohort median 4%
23 of 61+13% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.7% of net spend · cohort median 2%
17 of 61+26% vs median
Corporate & Central1.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
48 of 61-33% vs median
Highways & Transport1.6% of net spend · cohort median 3%
48 of 61-38% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.5% of net spend · cohort median 1%
27 of 61+9% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
53 of 61-44% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.32 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Telford and Wrekin’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Telford1650% Shaun DaviesLab
The Wrekin1650% Mark PritchardCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Labour Party-controlled unitary — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Telford and Wrekin
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level