The local authorityCouncil · metropolitan_borough · England · 1 of 36 councils (metropolitan_borough)

Rotherham.

Labour Party-controlled metropolitan_borough. £320m net revenue. 25 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typemetropolitan_borough
Seats62 councillors · 25 wards
Last election2 May 2024
Websiterotherham.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£320m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,283
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
35/62
Labour Party 56%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Rotherham is a metropolitan_borough controlled by Labour Party (35 of 62 seats). Net revenue is £320m for 2025-26. It covers 25 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.62 seats · last contested 2 May 2024

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 35Con 13Independent Berwick Hills Resident 10LD 4

Labour Party 56% · last contested 2 May 2024

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Drew TarmeyLDAnston Woodsetts2024
John Michael BlackhamConAnston Woodsetts2024
Timothy James Baum-DixonConAnston Woodsetts2024
Joshua BaconConAston Todwick2024
Sarah Ann AllenLabAston Todwick2024
Lyndsay PitchleyLabAughton Swallownest2024
Robert Paul TaylorLabAughton Swallownest2024
Ashiq HussainIndBoston Castle2024
Saghir AlamLabBoston Castle2024
Taiba YasseenIndBoston Castle2024
Gregory ReynoldsConBramley Ravenfield2024
Liz DuncanLabBramley Ravenfield2024
Showing 12 of 62·All 62 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

44%
Council tax
£139.9m · median 44%
42%
Central grants
£135.6m · median 41%
14%
Business rates
£44.9m · median 14%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (metropolitan_borough) median: 44% council tax, 42% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,871
County / upper-tier£0
Police£265
Fire & rescue£90
GLA precept£0
Parish average£58
Total Band-D£2,283

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)

How does Rotherham split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (metropolitan_borough)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Adult Social Care33.8% of net spend · cohort median 26%
1 of 35+31% vs median
Education26.3% of net spend · cohort median 41%
35 of 35-35% vs median
Children's Services18.3% of net spend · cohort median 15%
4 of 35+21% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.3% of net spend · cohort median 4%
10 of 35+27% vs median
Corporate & Central4.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
4 of 35+61% vs median
Public Health4.3% of net spend · cohort median 4%
17 of 35+1% vs median
Culture & Leisure3.4% of net spend · cohort median 2%
3 of 35+42% vs median
Highways & Transport1.5% of net spend · cohort median 2%
18 of 350% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
28 of 35-35% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.1% of net spend · cohort median 2%
28 of 35-30% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.13,212 payments · £49.4m gross · 5 Dec 20254 Feb 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
MEARS LTD£2.88m5.8%109
BIFFA BDR LTD£2.47m5.0%1
EQUANS REGENERATION LTD£2.01m4.1%118
REDACTED£1.97m4.0%1,692
SOUTH YORKSHIRE MCA - POLICE£1.68m3.4%3
TRANSFORM SCHOOLS (ROTHERHAM) LTD£1.63m3.3%8
RAMSDENS SO£1.09m2.2%1
SOUTH YORKSHIRE MAYORAL£0.99m2.0%2
HENRY BOOT CONSTRUCTION LTD£0.80m1.6%1
VOYAGE 1 LTD£0.70m1.4%54

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Adult Social CareMEARS LTD£2.88m
Planning And EconomicBIFFA BDR LTD£2.47m
Corporate And CentralSOUTH YORKSHIRE MCA - POLICE£1.67m
Childrens ServicesREDACTED£0.86m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.25 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Rotherham936% Sarah ChampionLab
Rother Valley936% Jake RichardsLab
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough728% John HealeyLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 35 other councils (metropolitan_borough)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
13,212 payments · 5 Dec 20254 Feb 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level