The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Rother.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £13m net revenue. 20 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats38 councillors · 20 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£13m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,561
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
10/38
Conservative and Unionist Party 26%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, Conservative and Unionist Party MPs.

Rother is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (10 of 38 seats). Net revenue is £13m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.38 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 10Lab 8LD 7Rother Association of Independent Councillors 7Green 3Independent Berwick Hills Resident 3

Conservative and Unionist Party 26% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Christine BaylissLabBexhill Central2023
Ruairi Anthony McCourtLabBexhill Central2023
Ashan JeeawonIndBexhill Collington2023
Doug OliverIndBexhill Collington2023
Andrew Peter HaywardIndBexhill Kewhurst2023
Brian John DraysonIndBexhill Kewhurst2023
Mark Colby LeggLabBexhill Old Town Worsham2023
Polly Janet GrayGrnBexhill Old Town Worsham2023
Charles Albert ClarkIndBexhill Pebsham St Michaels2023
Gareth Robert Michael DelanyLabBexhill Pebsham St Michaels2023
Hazel Linda TimpeIndBexhill Sackville2023
Terry ByrneIndBexhill Sackville2023
Showing 12 of 38·All 38 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

68%
Council tax
£9.1m · median 61%
21%
Central grants
£2.9m · median 26%
10%
Business rates
£1.4m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax councils (district): 68% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (61%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£231
County / upper-tier£1,867
Police£267
Fire & rescue£112
GLA precept£0
Parish average£84
Total Band-D£2,561

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Rother split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling38.3% of net spend · cohort median 32%
39 of 158+20% vs median
Housing & Homelessness26.9% of net spend · cohort median 14%
12 of 158+92% vs median
Corporate & Central26.4% of net spend · cohort median 27%
83 of 158-2% vs median
Culture & Leisure13.7% of net spend · cohort median 13%
75 of 158+2% vs median
Planning & Economic Development3.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
143 of 158-74% vs median
Highways & Transport-9.1% of net spend · cohort median -2%
126 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.3,864 payments · £11.3m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
WEALDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL£3.69m32.6%36
BMR CONSTRUCTION LTD£1.02m9.0%4
ROOST PEOPLE LTD£0.48m4.2%136
O´NEILL PATIENT SOLICITORS LLP CLIENTS ACCOUNT£0.34m3.0%1
EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL£0.28m2.5%32
DBR (LONDON) LIMITED£0.23m2.1%3
DE LA WARR PAVILION CHARITABLE TRUST£0.23m2.0%8
DTB CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD£0.19m1.7%5
G2V RECRUITMENT GROUP LTD, T/A VIVID RESOURCING£0.19m1.6%62
HAWORTH TOMPKINS LTD£0.18m1.6%5

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.20 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Bexhill and Battle1890% Kieran MullanCon
Hastings and Rye315% Helena DollimoreInd
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
3,864 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level