Ribble Valley.
Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £8m net revenue. 26 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.
31 May 2026
Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, opposed area.
Ribble Valley is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (19 of 40 seats). Net revenue is £8m for 2025-26. It covers 26 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.
Who sits in the chamber.
Conservative and Unionist Party 48% · last contested 4 May 2023
Councillors — the people.
| Councillor | Ward | Elected | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Rogerson | Con | Alston Hothersall | 2019 |
| Judith Anne Clark | Con | Alston Hothersall | 2019 |
| Steve Farmer | Con | Billington Langho | 2023 |
| Tony Austin | Con | Billington Langho | 2023 |
| Rosie Elms | Con | Bowland | 2019 |
| Stephen Alexis Atkinson | Con | Brockhall Dinckley | 2023 |
| Gary Kenneth Scott | Con | Chatburn | 2023 |
| Simon Hore | Con | Chipping | 2023 |
| Louise Edge | Con | Clayton Le Dale Salesbury | 2019 |
| Kieren Spencer | Lab | Derby Thornley | 2023 |
| Rachael Elizabeth Ray | Lab | Derby Thornley | 2023 |
| Lee Jameson | Lab | Dilworth | 2023 |
Where revenue comes from.
Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 58% council tax, 32% central grants.
Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)
Band-D bill.
| Council slice | £171 |
| County / upper-tier | £1,736 |
| Police | £277 |
| Fire & rescue | £90 |
| GLA precept | £0 |
| Parish average | £26 |
| Total Band-D | £2,300 |
Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish
Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.
How does Ribble Valley split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.
The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.
Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.
| Constituency | Wards | % of council | Current MP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ribble Valley | 16 | 62% | Maya Ellis | Lab |
| Pendle and Clitheroe | 10 | 38% | Jonathan Hinder | Lab |
Sources, methods & last update
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
vs 163 other councils (district)
Police, Fire, Parish on top
Not yet ingested for Ribble Valley
2023 boundaries
Pending ingest at LAD level