The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Redcar and Cleveland.

Labour Party-controlled unitary. £178m net revenue. 24 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats62 councillors · 24 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Websiteredcar-cleveland.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£178m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,424
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
24/62
Labour Party 39%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Redcar and Cleveland is a unitary controlled by Labour Party (24 of 62 seats). Net revenue is £178m for 2025-26. It covers 24 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.62 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 24Con 13Independent Berwick Hills Resident 13LD 11East Cleveland Independent 1

Labour Party 39% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Carolyn CurrConBelmont2023
Peter BerryIndBelmont2023
Barry HuntIndBrotton2023
Graham CutlerIndBrotton2023
Martin FletcherIndBrotton2023
Carl QuartermainLabCoatham2023
Lynne Patricia RynnLabCoatham2023
Ceri Julie-ann CawleyLabDormanstown2023
Debbie PowlayIndDormanstown2023
Ceri Julie-ann CawleyLabDormanstown2019
Christopher MasseyLabEston2023
David TaylorConEston2023
Showing 12 of 62·All 62 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

46%
Council tax
£82.7m · median 59%
40%
Central grants
£70.8m · median 30%
14%
Business rates
£24.7m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy unitary authoritie: 46% from council tax vs the cohort median of 59%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,994
County / upper-tier£0
Police£318
Fire & rescue£94
GLA precept£0
Parish average£18
Total Band-D£2,424

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Redcar and Cleveland split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education27.5% of net spend · cohort median 36%
54 of 61-23% vs median
Adult Social Care26.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
34 of 61-1% vs median
Children's Services24.0% of net spend · cohort median 15%
5 of 61+62% vs median
Public Health6.1% of net spend · cohort median 4%
4 of 61+65% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.4% of net spend · cohort median 6%
39 of 61-7% vs median
Highways & Transport4.3% of net spend · cohort median 3%
9 of 61+65% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.0% of net spend · cohort median 2%
38 of 61-9% vs median
Corporate & Central1.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
49 of 61-34% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.1% of net spend · cohort median 1%
38 of 61-17% vs median
Housing & Homelessness0.9% of net spend · cohort median 2%
57 of 61-54% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.6,519 payments · £25.3m gross · 5 Dec 20253 Dec 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
SUEZ RECYCLING & RECOVERY UK LTD£1.88m7.4%38
FOLKESCARE LIMITED T/A CAREMARK REDCAR & CLEVELAND£1.26m5.0%376
MIDDLESBROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL£1.13m4.5%16
MODERN SCHOOLS ( R & C ) LTD£0.91m3.6%7
HIGHFIELD NORTH EAST LTD£0.68m2.7%46
DALE CARE LTD£0.45m1.8%26
REAL LIFE OPTIONS£0.38m1.5%75
WILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LTD£0.38m1.5%1
PEARTREE PROJECTS LTD£0.37m1.5%16
BLOOM PROCUREMENT SERVICES LTD£0.36m1.4%14

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Planning And EconomicSUEZ RECYCLING & RECOVERY UK LTD£1.45m
Adult Social CareMIDDLESBROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL£0.78m
Childrens ServicesHIGHFIELD NORTH EAST LTD£0.68m
Corporate And CentralLIBERATA UK LTD£0.31m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.24 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Redcar1667% Anna TurleyInd
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland833% Luke MyerLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
6,519 payments · 5 Dec 20253 Dec 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level